2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA double-strand breaks in incubating female common eiders (Somateria mollissima): Comparison between a low and a high polluted area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fenstad et al [4] showed increased DNA double strand breaks in whole blood of incubating and fasting common eiders in Kongsfjorden, but argued that loss of body mass was a more important stress factor and thus a more important inducer of DNA damage than the simultaneous increase of contaminants. Furthermore, a positive relationship between DNA double strand breaks and levels of mercury, PCB-118, and DDE was observed in common eiders from a highly polluted area in the Baltic Sea, but not in common eiders from the Kongsfjorden population [43].…”
Section: Association Between Dna Damage and Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fenstad et al [4] showed increased DNA double strand breaks in whole blood of incubating and fasting common eiders in Kongsfjorden, but argued that loss of body mass was a more important stress factor and thus a more important inducer of DNA damage than the simultaneous increase of contaminants. Furthermore, a positive relationship between DNA double strand breaks and levels of mercury, PCB-118, and DDE was observed in common eiders from a highly polluted area in the Baltic Sea, but not in common eiders from the Kongsfjorden population [43].…”
Section: Association Between Dna Damage and Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies have shown associations between DNA damage and contaminant exposure when periods of low and high stress are compared, such as early and late in the incubation period [4], or when individuals from high exposure areas are compared with those from to low exposure areas [39,43]. Fenstad et al [4] showed increased DNA double strand breaks in whole blood of incubating and fasting common eiders in Kongsfjorden, but argued that loss of body mass was a more important stress factor and thus a more important inducer of DNA damage than the simultaneous increase of contaminants.…”
Section: Association Between Dna Damage and Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the frequency of ENAs has been used as a marker to detect genotoxic damage in birds (De Mas et al 2015; Santos et al 2017b). Although its genotoxic effects in birds have been scarcely addressed in the literature, Hg has been suggested to have genotoxic effects (e.g., Fenstad et al 2016). In the present study, higher levels of Hg in down feathers were positively related to an increase in ENA frequency, but again not with increased dietary intake of Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not much is known about the genotoxic effects of organochlorine contaminants in Arctic wildlife. Some studies have been carried out, for example, on glaucous gulls (L. hyperboreus) fed environmentally contaminated eggs (Østby et al 2005;Krøkje et al 2006) and on fasting common eiders (Somateria mollissima; Fenstad et al 2014Fenstad et al , 2016. According to the literature, no studies of genotoxicity in wild Arctic fish have been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not that well studied, there are reports showing a clear and significant relationship between DNA damage and exposure to organochlorine contaminants (Binelli et al 2008;Marabini et al 2011;Fenstad et al 2014Fenstad et al , 2016. Srinivasan et al (2001) showed that PCB metabolites can induce breaks in DNA strands in vitro, and Binelli et al (2008) showed that dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, a metabolite of the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, caused DNA strand breaks in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%