Y chromosome loss has been debated for decades, with a traditional view that Ys are lost in species in which they are most degenerate. However, in 2015 Blackmon and Demuth [1] hypothesised that the probability of Y chromosome loss is correlated with sex chromosome meiotic strategy, and not the extent of Y chromosome degradation.The fragile Y hypothesis was formed after analysis of sex chromosomes in more than 4000 beetle species. Species in which XY segregation does not rely on recombination, and therefore chiasmata formation within a pseudoautosomal region (PAR), were less likely to have lost their Y chromosome than species in which XY segregation requires chiasmata formation. Y loss was especially evident for species with a small PAR, because a reduced PAR presents fewer opportunities for obligate chiasmata formation, increasing the production of sperm that lack a Y. Frequent Y aneuploidy results in selective pressure to remove genes that are critical for Y function. In the absence of critical function, existence of the Y is fragile.Blackmon and Demuth [1] assign the fate of Y chromosomes to three outcomes: 1) Rejuvenation by addition of an autosome to the X and Y to extend the PAR, which results in greater opportunity for faithful chiasmata formation. Such an addition occurred in the placental mammal ancestor, which was perhaps fixed simply by selection for a reduced frequency of aneuploid sperm. However, PAR size was inevitably reduced again as recombination between new regions of the X and Y ceased, so the burden of aneuploid sperm that lack a Y returned. In the absence of repeated autosomal additions to the X and Y, rejuvenation is only a temporary fix.2) Long-term retention of the Y after evolution of achiasmatic or asynaptic XY segregation. Because a diminished PAR is not required for accurate XY segregation, Y aneuploidy occurs less frequently. This diminishes pressure to remove critical Y chromosome function and, therefore, the chance of Y loss. In all marsupials there is asynaptic XY segregation; and in rodents, achiasmatic sex chromosomes have evolved multiple times. As predicted by the fragile Y hypothesis there is no recorded loss of the Y chromosome in species with an altered meiotic strategy.3) Loss. Unreliable chiasmata formation in a small PAR may result in erratic XY segregation, and an increased frequecny of aneuploid sperm that lack a Y chromosome. This could impose strong selective pressure to remove essential functions from the Y chromosome, predisposing it to loss. Accordingly, within eutherian mammals, Y loss has been observed in groups with small PARs (e.g. rodents). In two of three Ryukyu spiny rat species the Y has been lost, and in the third, the Y was rescued by rejuvenation of the PAR after addition of an autosome. In the famous example of Y loss in the genus Ellobius, there were two independent losses, [2] highlighting its fragility.So in light of its relatively stable gene content, [3] how fragile is the human Y chromosome? Blackmon and Demuth [1] highlight that Turner syndrome is...