Pinpointing the vesper bat transposon revolution using the Miniopterus natalensis genome

Abstract

BackgroundAround 40 million years ago DNA transposons began accumulating in an ancestor of bats in the family Vespertilionidae. Since that time, Class II transposons have been continuously reinvading and accumulating in vespertilionid genomes at a rate that is unprecedented in mammals. Miniopterus (Miniopteridae), a genus of long-fingered bats that was recently elevated from Vespertilionidae, is the sister taxon to the vespertilionids and is often used as an outgroup when studying transposable elements in vesper bats. Previous wet-lab techniques failed to identify Helitrons, TcMariners, or hAT transposons in Miniopterus. Limitations of those methods and ambiguous results regarding the distribution of piggyBac transposons left some questions as to the distribution of Class II elements in this group. The recent release of the Miniopterus natalensis genome allows for transposable element discovery with a higher degree of precision.ResultsHere we analyze the transposable element content of M. natalensis to pinpoint with greater accuracy the taxonomic distribution of Class II transposable elements in bats. These efforts demonstrate that, compared to the vespertilionids, Class II TEs are highly mutated and comprise only a small portion of the M. natalensis genome. Despite the limited Class II content, M. natalensis possesses a limited number of lineage-specific, low copy number piggyBacs and shares several TcMariner families with vespertilionid bats. Multiple efforts to identify Helitrons, one of the major TE components of vesper bat genomes, using de novo repeat identification and structural based searches failed.ConclusionsThese observations combined with previous results inform our understanding of the events leading to the unique Class II element acquisition that characterizes vespertilionids. While it appears that a small number of TcMariner and piggyBac elements were deposited in the ancestral Miniopterus + vespertilionid genome, these elements are not present in M. natalensis genome at high copy number. Instead, this work indicates that the vesper bats alone experienced the expansion of TEs ranging from Helitrons to piggyBacs to hATs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0071-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recent expansion and adaptive evolution of the carcinoembryonic antigen family in bats of the Yangochiroptera subgroup

“…1a ). The phylogenetic tree based on orthologous CEACAM sequences, depicted very closely the phylogenetic relationship of bat families published previously based on other genetic data except for the relative position of Mormoopidae and Miniopteridae to Vespertilionidae [ 14 , 18 ]. While Miniopteridae and Vespertilionidae are considered to belong to the Vespertilionoides superfamily, Mormoopidae belong to the Noctilionoidea superfamily.…”

Six new reference-quality bat genomes illuminate the molecular basis and evolution of bat adaptations

“…These two TE classes have been largely dormant in most mammals for the past ~40 million years and recent insertions are essentially absent from other Boreoeutherian genomes 32 . These results add to previous findings revealing a substantial diversity in TE content within bats, with some species exhibiting recent and ongoing accumulation from TE classes that are extinct in most other mammals while other species show negligible evidence of TE activity 33 .…”

Conflicting Evolutionary Histories of the Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genomes in New World Myotis Bats

“…Horizontal transfer of genes is thought to be rare in eukaryotes, but, vespertilionids in general ( Thomas et al 2011 ; Platt et al 2014 ; Platt et al 2016 ), and Myotis in particular ( Pritham and Feschotte 2007 ; Ray et al 2007 ; Ray et al 2008 ; Pagan et al 2010 ), have experienced horizontal transfer of DNA transposons. These events would not be reflected in our phylogeny because repetitive sequences were removed prior to phylogenetic analyses.…”