2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequencing Structural Variants in Cancer for Precision Therapeutics

Abstract: The identification of mutations that guide therapy selection for patients with cancer is now routine in many clinical centres. The majority of assays used for solid tumour profiling use DNA sequencing to interrogate somatic point mutations because they are relatively easy to identify and interpret. Many cancers, however, including high-grade serous ovarian, oesophageal, and small-cell lung cancer, are driven by somatic structural variants that are not measured by these assays. Therefore, there is currently an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutations in EZH2 are largely clustered in codon Y646 (Online Supplementary Figure S1) and are therefore technically very easily amenable to simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, 55 while chromosomal gains can be monitored using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or NGS. 56,57 This signifies that EZH2 mutation status and chromosome 18 gain have a high potential for clinical implementation, in contrast to the microenvironment population markers CD8 and CD163. With current techniques, even if optimized, the absolute quantitative differences are too small between these 2 extreme cohorts to become a powerful and clinically useful tool for the scores around the cut point.…”
Section: P-value and Fdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutations in EZH2 are largely clustered in codon Y646 (Online Supplementary Figure S1) and are therefore technically very easily amenable to simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, 55 while chromosomal gains can be monitored using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or NGS. 56,57 This signifies that EZH2 mutation status and chromosome 18 gain have a high potential for clinical implementation, in contrast to the microenvironment population markers CD8 and CD163. With current techniques, even if optimized, the absolute quantitative differences are too small between these 2 extreme cohorts to become a powerful and clinically useful tool for the scores around the cut point.…”
Section: P-value and Fdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BiSeqS can complement screening for other genomic alterations, such as structural variants (SVs), for rare allele detection and monitoring (52). SVs provide exquisitely specific markers for cancer that can be used for liquid biopsies (9,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the rapid evolution of next generation sequencing, the past decade has seen the characterization of nucleic acidboth somatic and/or germline alterations in a wide range of cancers generating a large body of information pertaining to how cancer develops, evolves, and reacts to various treatment modalities [Macintyre et al, 2016]. Also, a considerable number of genomic variants have been previously been reported to be causative of, or associated with, tumor progression or an increased risk for various types of cancer [Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011].…”
Section: Cancer Genomics Working Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%