“…This situation changed in 2010 with the publication of a large empirical Y‐STR mutation rate study analyzing 186 Y‐STRs in nearly 2,000 DNA‐confirmed father–son pairs, which highlighted 13 Y‐STR markers with mutation rates > 10 −2 mutations per marker per meiosis termed rapidly mutating (RM) Y‐STRs (Ballantyne et al, 2010). Followed by the first empirical demonstrations of their suitability for male relative differentiation (Ballantyne et al, 2012, 2014), many subsequent studies provided increasing evidence on the value of RM Y‐STRs for differentiating related, including closely related, and also unrelated men (Adnan, Ralf, Rakha, Kousouri, & Kayser, 2016; Alghafri, Goodwin, & Hadi, 2013; Boattini et al, 2016, 2019; Lang et al, 2017; Niederstätter, Berger, Kayser, & Parson, 2016; Robino et al, 2015; Salvador et al, 2019; Turrina, Caratti, Ferrian, & De Leo, 2016; Westen et al, 2015; Zgonjanin, Alghafri, Antov et al, 2017). In genetic genealogy too, RM Y‐STRs are advantageous as they provide improved differentiation of unrelated individuals (Ballantyne et al, 2014) and they allow distinguishing closely related from more distantly related males by taking the number of observed mutations into account (Larmuseau et al, 2019).…”