2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in urbanization degree and consequences on the diversity of conventional vs. rapidly mutating Y-STRs in five municipalities from a small region of the Tyrolean Alps in Austria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this one does not follow a gradient from north to south but manifests as an enrichment of haplogroup E1b1b-M35 in the eastern part of the country, close to Austria. This pattern fits quite well with data from Tyrol, a region in Western Austria [61], showing an important fraction of 16.9 % haplogroup E in this area, mostly attributed to E-M78, a subclade of E1b1b-M35.…”
Section: Haplogroup Distributionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, this one does not follow a gradient from north to south but manifests as an enrichment of haplogroup E1b1b-M35 in the eastern part of the country, close to Austria. This pattern fits quite well with data from Tyrol, a region in Western Austria [61], showing an important fraction of 16.9 % haplogroup E in this area, mostly attributed to E-M78, a subclade of E1b1b-M35.…”
Section: Haplogroup Distributionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A large empirical Y‐STR mutation rate study conducted with 186 bioinformatically identified Y‐STRs in ∼2000 DNA‐confirmed European father–son pairs, which identified a set of 13 RM Y‐STR markers (DYF387S1, DYF399S1, DYF403S1, DYF404S1, DYS449, DYS518, DYS526, DYS547, DYS570, DYS576, DYS612, DYS626, and DYS627), which are capable of differentiating nearly 70% of father–son pairs, 56% of brothers, and 67% of cousins in 103 pairs from 80 male pedigrees [14]. Subsequently, the possibility of differentiating closely related and unrelated males by the set of 13 RM Y‐STR markers, which allows Y‐STR analysis to approach the level of individual identification, demonstrated by lots of confirmatory literature [15–21]. However, the identified set of 13 RM Y‐STR markers provides limitations for male relative differentiation, particularly regarding close patrilineal relatives and different mutation rates for the same Y‐STR marker in different populations, which limits applications in forensic genetics and genetic genealogy [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation changed in 2010 with the publication of a large empirical Y‐STR mutation rate study analyzing 186 Y‐STRs in nearly 2,000 DNA‐confirmed father–son pairs, which highlighted 13 Y‐STR markers with mutation rates > 10 −2 mutations per marker per meiosis termed rapidly mutating (RM) Y‐STRs (Ballantyne et al, 2010). Followed by the first empirical demonstrations of their suitability for male relative differentiation (Ballantyne et al, 2012, 2014), many subsequent studies provided increasing evidence on the value of RM Y‐STRs for differentiating related, including closely related, and also unrelated men (Adnan, Ralf, Rakha, Kousouri, & Kayser, 2016; Alghafri, Goodwin, & Hadi, 2013; Boattini et al, 2016, 2019; Lang et al, 2017; Niederstätter, Berger, Kayser, & Parson, 2016; Robino et al, 2015; Salvador et al, 2019; Turrina, Caratti, Ferrian, & De Leo, 2016; Westen et al, 2015; Zgonjanin, Alghafri, Antov et al, 2017). In genetic genealogy too, RM Y‐STRs are advantageous as they provide improved differentiation of unrelated individuals (Ballantyne et al, 2014) and they allow distinguishing closely related from more distantly related males by taking the number of observed mutations into account (Larmuseau et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%