2016
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Crossmatch/Issue Ratio

Abstract: Electronic crossmatching is common, and the C/I ratio can be an indicator of efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies typically did not provide data on the number of units crossmatched before delivery; therefore, we could not report transfusion service quality indicators, such as the crossmatch-to-transfusion and crossmatch-to-issue ratio. 12,53,54 The results of our study are specific to studies published in countries with developed economies; therefore, our findings are not generalizable to countries with developing economies. The method of accreta diagnosis varied widely between studies, with some requiring pathologic confirmation for inclusion and others diagnosing based on clinical factors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Studies typically did not provide data on the number of units crossmatched before delivery; therefore, we could not report transfusion service quality indicators, such as the crossmatch-to-transfusion and crossmatch-to-issue ratio. 12,53,54 The results of our study are specific to studies published in countries with developed economies; therefore, our findings are not generalizable to countries with developing economies. The method of accreta diagnosis varied widely between studies, with some requiring pathologic confirmation for inclusion and others diagnosing based on clinical factors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The issue‐to‐transfusion ratio provides a useful metric for future quality improvement efforts focused on perioperative blood delivery. While the crossmatch‐to‐transfusion ratio has become a widely accepted quality and effectiveness metric, it is less relevant in the era of electronic crossmatch (i.e., for antibody‐negative patients, crossmatch orders are performed electronically only when the issue request is received) 20,21 . Measuring the ratio of units issued to the operating rooms to units transfused is a better indicator of the effectiveness of surgical blood issue orders, 3 because electronic crossmatching takes little time and effort, while issuing blood and processing returns requires substantial time and effort 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio has become a widely accepted quality and effectiveness metric, it is less relevant in the era of electronic crossmatch (i.e., for antibody-negative patients, crossmatch orders are performed electronically only when the issue request is received). 20,21 Measuring the ratio of units issued to the operating rooms to units transfused is a better indicator of the effectiveness of surgical blood issue orders, 3 because electronic crossmatching takes little time and effort, while issuing blood and processing returns requires substantial time and effort. 2 In our non-cardiovascular operating rooms, we were able to achieve an issue-to-transfusion ratio approaching 1:1 by building clinician trust in a reliable on-demand blood delivery system via a pneumatic tube system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should examine transfusion service quality indicators (such as the crossmatch-to-transfusion and crossmatch-to-issue ratio). 23–25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should examine transfusion service quality indicators (such as the crossmatch-totransfusion and crossmatch-to-issue ratio). [23][24][25] It is possible that the implementation of less stringent blood ordering recommendations may result in more frequent use of emergency-release blood products and, secondarily, recipient alloimmunization. However, the transfusion rate of emergency-release blood products from a massive transfusion protocol in obstetrics is extremely low (0.09-0.21%).…”
Section: Clinical Implications Transfusion Preparednessmentioning
confidence: 99%