2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four risk scores for in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing heart valve surgery: A multicenter study in a Chinese population

Abstract: Both the STS score and Euroscore II, especially the STS score, were suitable for individual operative risk in Chinese patients undergoing single valve surgery compared with the Ambler score and NYC score, however, all four risk scores were not suitable for prediction in Chinese patients undergoing multiple valve surgery. Therefore, the creation of a new model which accurately predicts outcomes in patients undergoing multiple valve surgery is possibly required in China.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In cardiac surgery, EuroScore II showed good performance in Chinese patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting but underpredicted mortality rates in the high-risk subgroup ( Bai et al, 2016 ). EuroScore II was suitable for predicting the operative risk in Chinese patients undergoing single valve surgery, but it could not achieve the same performance in patients receiving multiple valve surgery ( Wang et al, 2016 ). Moreover, both the STS score and the Parsonnet model had poor calibration when predicting prolonged intense care unit stay ( p value for the Hosmer–Lemeshow test <0.001) among Chinese patients receiving heart valve surgery ( Zhang et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cardiac surgery, EuroScore II showed good performance in Chinese patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting but underpredicted mortality rates in the high-risk subgroup ( Bai et al, 2016 ). EuroScore II was suitable for predicting the operative risk in Chinese patients undergoing single valve surgery, but it could not achieve the same performance in patients receiving multiple valve surgery ( Wang et al, 2016 ). Moreover, both the STS score and the Parsonnet model had poor calibration when predicting prolonged intense care unit stay ( p value for the Hosmer–Lemeshow test <0.001) among Chinese patients receiving heart valve surgery ( Zhang et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Unfortunately, the frequency of mitral valve surgery in Chinese patients with MR has been far lower than that which would be expected due to a number of factors, also consistent with a previous studies conducted in Western countries. [9][10][11][12] An effective transcatheter mitral valve therapy is therefore warranted to meet this unmet need, particularly in mainland China. While there are a number of different types of transcatheter mitral valve interventions being developed, the transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair technique has been recommended as a standard treatment option for patients severe symptomatic and high-surgical risk DMR or for those with FMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the Asian patients are reluctant to undergo open-heart surgery and the observed mortality is higher than the surgical risk prediction model,24)25) there is an unmet need to ameliorate the disease awareness and the therapeutic adherence in Asians. Even though more than half of the subjects who underwent MitraClip procedure at age over 75 in western registries, Asians paid more attention about peri-operative complications and long-term efficacy especially after age of 80.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%