2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1150-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-silico discovery of cancer-specific peptide-HLA complexes for targeted therapy

Abstract: BackgroundMajor Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) or Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Class I molecules bind to peptide fragments of proteins degraded inside the cell and display them on the cell surface. We are interested in peptide-HLA complexes involving peptides that are derived from proteins specifically expressed in cancer cells. Such complexes have been shown to provide an effective means of precisely targeting cancer cells by engineered T-cells and antibodies, which would be an improvement over current che… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, T-cell cross-reactivity can be triggered even by peptides with no sequence identity and low biochemical similarity 78 , and might be driven by specific structural similarities in hot-spots over the TCR-interacting surface 79 . In this context, structure-based methods for cross-reactivity prediction have been proposed, either clustering pMHCs of interest based on structural similarity 78 , 80 , or integrating structural information and protein expression levels into sequence-based proteomic searches 81 , 82 . This field will spawn significant developments in the coming years, particularly considering the importance of cross-reactivity prediction for T-cell-based immunotherapy 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, T-cell cross-reactivity can be triggered even by peptides with no sequence identity and low biochemical similarity 78 , and might be driven by specific structural similarities in hot-spots over the TCR-interacting surface 79 . In this context, structure-based methods for cross-reactivity prediction have been proposed, either clustering pMHCs of interest based on structural similarity 78 , 80 , or integrating structural information and protein expression levels into sequence-based proteomic searches 81 , 82 . This field will spawn significant developments in the coming years, particularly considering the importance of cross-reactivity prediction for T-cell-based immunotherapy 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these methods involve assessing peptide sequence similarity, while also accounting for protein tissue expression and MHC binding ( 44 , 45 ). Others are based on pMHC structural similarity ( 46 48 ) or some combination of previously mentioned features ( 49 , 50 ). Despite the incredible challenge at hand and the current limitations of these computational methods, encouraging results are being reported.…”
Section: Hypothesis and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, even on individual cell types, data from our in-house mass spectrometry database and published direct evidence demonstrate that the number of unique peptides can be in the range of tens of thousands (39)(40)(41)(42). Considering the full human protein-coding genome, the number of peptides presented has been estimated to be over 11 million (43).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%