2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.05.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does increased superficial neck flexor activity in the craniocervical flexion test reflect reduced deep flexor activity in people with neck pain?

Abstract: The results affirm the interpretation that higher levels of activity of the superficial flexor muscles are an indicator of reduced deep cervical flexor activity in the craniocervical flexion test. Further studies of neuromuscular and movement strategies used by people with neck pain to compensate for poorer activation of the deep cervical flexors will inform best clinical assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
61
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The musculus scalenus anterior has a function in inspiration, as well as constituting superficial neck flexors with the musculus sternocleidomastoid. [3] Although not used directly during weight lifting exercises, the anterior scalene muscle and subclavian muscles have functions during deep inspiration. If neck flexion is performed at the same time as inspiration during weight lifting exercises in a supine position, the anterior scalene triangle, in particular, becomes smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The musculus scalenus anterior has a function in inspiration, as well as constituting superficial neck flexors with the musculus sternocleidomastoid. [3] Although not used directly during weight lifting exercises, the anterior scalene muscle and subclavian muscles have functions during deep inspiration. If neck flexion is performed at the same time as inspiration during weight lifting exercises in a supine position, the anterior scalene triangle, in particular, becomes smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it must be noted that the stabilizing effect arrives from static muscle contractions and the subsequent physiological effect might not be the same as from dynamic muscle contractions during the CE exercise [33][34][35]. Studies using wire electrodes to separate activity in the deep and superficial neck extensor muscles have pointed out the importance of activity specifically in the deep extensor muscles for patients with chronic neck pain [36]. Since surface EMG records from all of the underlying muscles, we cannot rule out that the same activity in SH and CE represent different contribution from the neck extensor muscles that may be of importance for specific patient groups.…”
Section: Main Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for cervical kinematic and kinetic aberrations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], previous electrophysiological findings have demonstrated the appearance of neuromuscular adaptations for patients with neck pain [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Increased activation of the superficial cervical flexor muscles and the upper trapezius [23][24][25][26][27]30] and reduced activation of the deep cervical flexor muscles [27][28][29] account for the compensatory modulation of hyper-activation of the superficial cervical flexor muscles for the weak or inhibited activation of the deep cervical flexor muscles in neck pain patients [25,26]. Also, patients with neck pain had neural recruitment strategies that showed relatively poor efficiency in the superficial flexor muscles when required motor tasks were executed [31,32], reflecting the phenomenon of greater fatigability of the superficial cervical flexor muscles [30,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%