2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0578-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial Factors and Sport Injuries: Meta-analyses for Prediction and Prevention

Abstract: The results support the model's suggestion that psychosocial variables, as well as psychologically, based interventions, can influence injury risk among athletes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
168
3
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
6
168
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the results of the study show that in the group of players, those who had suffered an injury showed significantly lower stress values than those who had not been injured, results that are not in agreement with what is found in the majority of previous studies [9,26,32], and are not predicted exclusively by the Andersen and Williams model [13,14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the results of the study show that in the group of players, those who had suffered an injury showed significantly lower stress values than those who had not been injured, results that are not in agreement with what is found in the majority of previous studies [9,26,32], and are not predicted exclusively by the Andersen and Williams model [13,14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…This point, as seen before, is very important regarding the prevention side of the psychological interventions with injured athletes [12,38]. Furthermore, although in the Ivarsson et al [9] meta-analysis, the role of the athletes' personality traits-which could include the trait anxiety-is found to have to a marginal association with the injury rates, the current research should not overlook the influence of a key aspect, such as this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, both reviews excluded studies that did not provide information that would allow them to complete the targeted statistical analyses 24 25. However, in the two previous systematic reviews, studies were excluded if they were not underpinned by the model of stress and athletic injury 25. Consequently, these reviews may have excluded relevant evidence,3 and this could have implications for clinical decision-making 26…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%