2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Lysozyme with Rhodamine B: A combined analysis of spectroscopic & molecular docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the fluorescence quenching was dynamic in nature, static quenching through the ground state complex formation cannot be ignored as the complex formation between BSA and ILs observed from absorbance studies. When small molecules bind independently to a set of equivalent sites of a biomolecule, the equilibrium between free and bound molecules is given by the following, equation (2) italiclogF0FF=italiclogKb+nitaliclog[],Q0.25em where, n is the number of binding sites and K b is the binding constant. The values of n and K b were obtained from the slope and intercept of the plot of log(F 0 ‐ F)/F 0 versus log[Q] respectively (Figure S1) The results for the three ILs at different temperatures (298, 301, 304 and 307 K) are given in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the fluorescence quenching was dynamic in nature, static quenching through the ground state complex formation cannot be ignored as the complex formation between BSA and ILs observed from absorbance studies. When small molecules bind independently to a set of equivalent sites of a biomolecule, the equilibrium between free and bound molecules is given by the following, equation (2) italiclogF0FF=italiclogKb+nitaliclog[],Q0.25em where, n is the number of binding sites and K b is the binding constant. The values of n and K b were obtained from the slope and intercept of the plot of log(F 0 ‐ F)/F 0 versus log[Q] respectively (Figure S1) The results for the three ILs at different temperatures (298, 301, 304 and 307 K) are given in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…decrease in fluorescence intensity) is very convenient to explore the nature and binding mechanism of the protein–ligand complex. The ligand molecules quenched the protein fluorescence by a range of molecular interaction processes such as molecular rearrangement, excited‐state reactions, energy transfer, ground‐state complex formation or collisional quenching BSA emission spectra in the absence or presence of various concentrations of CuFe 2 O 4 NP (displayed in Figure ) indicated that the fluorescence intensity of BSA gradually decreased with the addition of different concentrations of CuFe 2 O 4 NP, but there was no significant wavelength shift observed in the emission maximum. This result suggested that the interaction between BSA and CuFe 2 O 4 NP occurred and the polarity in the microenvironment near the Trp residue was not affected by this interaction …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far‐UV (190–250 nm) CD measurement provides information about the possible changes in the secondary structure of protein upon interaction with small ligand molecules . The two negative bands at 208 and 222 nm referred to the characteristic peaks for the BSA α‐helical structure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CD shows no apparent change between pH 7.59 and 11.10 (Figure3B), indicating that Lys retains all the features of secondary structure found in the native protein. However, at pH 12.13, two peaks decrease obviously to a minimum value ( Figure 3B), which suggest that the secondary structure of Lys was unfolded partially [25,26]. Thus, from pH 2.55 to 11.10, the tertiary structure of Lys altered but its secondary structure did not unfold obviously until pH up to 12.13, which may be the reason for the potential change in Figure 2A.…”
Section: Protein Conformationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lys contains six tryptophan (Trp) residues and three tyrosine (Tyr) residues (inset in Figure3A). Among Trp residues, Trp 28 108, 111, and 123 residues are present in the -domain, and Trp 62 and 63 residues are located at the hinge region between  and domains of the protein [25]. Trp 62 and 108 residues are partially exposed to the solvent and not close to cystine or methionine sulfurs, which are responsible for the most intrinsic fluorescence of native Lys and reflect the conformational alteration of protein [20].…”
Section: Protein Conformationmentioning
confidence: 99%