2016
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2016.1201725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological contamination of the euro currency in Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the United States, 94% contamination of circulating one dollar bill was reported in 2002 (5). A similar high contamination rate has been reported in Estonia (6), Pakistan (7), Croatia (2) and Ghana (8).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the United States, 94% contamination of circulating one dollar bill was reported in 2002 (5). A similar high contamination rate has been reported in Estonia (6), Pakistan (7), Croatia (2) and Ghana (8).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Other studies regarding contamination ascribed to microbial load specific to national currency notes have been reported in Bangladesh ( Ahmed et al, 2010 ; Hosen et al, 2006 ), Ethiopia ( Alemayehu & Ashenafi, 2019 ), India ( Rote, Deogade & Kawale, 2010 ), Iran ( Dehghani, Dehghani & Estakhr, 2011 ), Nepal ( Lamichhane et al, 2009 ; Prasai, Yami & Joshi, 2008 ), Nigeria ( Awe et al, 2010 ; Kawo et al, 2009 ; Oyero & Emikwe, 2007 ; Umeh, Juluku & Ichor, 2007 ), Saudi Arabia ( Ghamdi et al, 2011 ; Rashed et al, 2006 ), South Africa ( Igumbor et al, 2007 ), as well as Sudan ( Saadabi et al, 2010 ). In Europe, Mändar et al (2016) studied microbial contamination of euro money, whereas in the USA, Michaels (2002) reported on handling money and serving ready-to-eat food, which considered the same gloved hands or without hygiene intervention, and provided in food service establishments, would introduce the risk of cross-contamination to foods. In the global front, Vriesekoop et al (2010) performed the hygiene status of some world’s currencies by capturing food outlets in 10 different countries (Australia, Burkina Faso, China, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found more frequently the presence of potentially pathogenic S. aureus, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus cereus or Neisseria flavescens in case of more than one percent of E. faecalis DNA compared to less than one percent in total bacterial 16S rRNA of studied 27 mobile phones (10/15 vs. 3/12, respectively; p=0.031). The non-pathogenic skin microbe M. luteus frequently found in large amounts on circulating currencies 20,21 was also found more frequently on phones with more than one compared to less than one percent (11/15 vs. 4/12, respectively; p=0.038) of E. faecalis DNA (Table 1). Although in our study an evaluation of the health condition of schoolchildren was not addressed, E. faecalis appeared to be a good environmental contamination indicator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%