2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of filtration techniques to study environmental fate of engineered metallic nanoparticles: Factors affecting filter performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrafiltration membranes are well described with respect to the separation of globular proteins; however, very small (<5 nm) AgNPs may pose unique challenges for separation of soluble from particulate species. Average pore sizes for 10 kDa molecular weight cut off filters used in centrifugal filtration have been estimated at 3.2 ± 2.3 nm (Van Koetsem et al, 2017). These investigators further indicated that a 10 kDa membrane was suitable for separating 14 nm AgNPs from the ionic Ag fraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrafiltration membranes are well described with respect to the separation of globular proteins; however, very small (<5 nm) AgNPs may pose unique challenges for separation of soluble from particulate species. Average pore sizes for 10 kDa molecular weight cut off filters used in centrifugal filtration have been estimated at 3.2 ± 2.3 nm (Van Koetsem et al, 2017). These investigators further indicated that a 10 kDa membrane was suitable for separating 14 nm AgNPs from the ionic Ag fraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After filtration through 0.45-μm syringe filters (Chemland), samples were centrifuged in a 3-kDa ultrafiltration device (Amicon Ultra-15 Filters, Millipore) for 45 min at 4000× g . The 3-kDa pore size is estimated to be 2.1 ± 1.3 nm (Van Koetsem et al 2017); hence, it prevents the penetration of nanoparticles through the membrane and at the same time allows the penetration of ions. Then, the water extracts and ultrafiltrates were acidified with a drop of HNO 3 and analyzed for Zn concentration using flame AAS (Perkin Elmer AAnalyst 200).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). For example, some losses are likely to be attributed to the filtration step, where dissolved ions and/or particles may sorb to the filter, or to plant fragments which are then removed by the filter; subsequent blocking of the filter could result in further losses [64,69]. Therefore, careful assessment of the particle recovery and reproducibility for the MeOH method presented above was undertaken.…”
Section: Total Metal and Particle Number Concentration Recovery And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Au NP, the addition of plant material to the extraction seems to aid the recovery, though the lettucecontaining condition is not statistically different from the Au NP only extract (averaging 100% recovery with plant tissues compared to 91.6% recovery without). This is hypothesized to be a result of additional organic matter (from the degradation of the leaf tissue) priming the filter to allow the greater passage of Au NP, a phenomenon referred to as "filter wetting" [69]. Losses for all three NPs were lowest when in the presence of lettuce.…”
Section: Total Metal and Particle Number Concentration Recovery And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation