2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Trending of Continuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accurate and rapid measurement of hemoglobin concentration is crucial during the decision-making process for fluid and transfusion therapy in complicated surgical procedures. Several articles have discussed the accuracy of Radical-7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter [1118]; however, the lack of statistical agreement renders the clinical applicability of this method debatable. In our consideration, the ability of one device to provide helpful measurement data may prove valuable for monitoring during complicated surgical procedures as well as critical populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accurate and rapid measurement of hemoglobin concentration is crucial during the decision-making process for fluid and transfusion therapy in complicated surgical procedures. Several articles have discussed the accuracy of Radical-7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter [1118]; however, the lack of statistical agreement renders the clinical applicability of this method debatable. In our consideration, the ability of one device to provide helpful measurement data may prove valuable for monitoring during complicated surgical procedures as well as critical populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage error in this study was calculated with the LoA divided by the mean hemoglobin data {100 × [LOA/ (mean SpHb + mean tHb)/2]}. Although several studies have excluded data with low perfusion values [11, 23, 24], we sought to determine the accuracy in this group of paired data. Therefore, the present study, we compared the paired data with PI values < 1.0 with those having a PI value ≥1.0 to assess the accuracy of SpHb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Huang et al [20], in a study conducted in the same surgical population (blood loss 1982.50 ± 1470.54 mL), demonstrated that the correlation between SpHb and tHb was 0.59 (p < 0.001). The Bland−Altman analysis revealed that bias between SpHb and tHb was 2.28 g/dL, and limits of agreement were from −0.78 to 5.34 g/dL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Huang et al conducted a study to evaluate the accuracy of SpHb measured by Radical-7 in patients with liver transplantation. In addition to an insufficient trending ability, they found that the correlation was moderate (r � 0.59) but bias and limits of agreement were high (2.28 g/ dL, -0.78 to 5.34 g/dL) between SpHb and tHb [39]. A recent study by Erdogan Kayhan et al revealed that the absolute bias and limits of agreement between tHb and SpHb detected by Radical-7 in preanhepatic phase were 1.11 g/dL and − 2.08 to 4.31 g/dL, respectively [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%