2016
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00511.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond cones: an improved model of whisker bending based on measured mechanics and tapering

Abstract: The sense of touch is represented by neural activity patterns evoked by mechanosensory input forces. The rodent whisker system is exceptional for studying the neurophysiology of touch in part because these forces can be precisely computed from video of whisker deformation. We evaluate the accuracy of a standard model of whisker bending, which assumes quasi-static dynamics and a linearly tapered conical profile, using controlled whisker deflections. We find significant discrepancies between model and experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We treated each whisker as a cone based on its radius at base and its length. Consistent with prior work (Hires et al, 2016), we found that the shape of individual whiskers deviated slightly from that of a pure cone (not shown), with uncertainty in I p of ~50%. Taken together, our estimates of uncertainty in E , I p and Δ k p imply that our reported values of absolute bending moment and forces must be considered approximations, accurate to no better than a factor of two (Taylor, 1997).…”
Section: Star Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We treated each whisker as a cone based on its radius at base and its length. Consistent with prior work (Hires et al, 2016), we found that the shape of individual whiskers deviated slightly from that of a pure cone (not shown), with uncertainty in I p of ~50%. Taken together, our estimates of uncertainty in E , I p and Δ k p imply that our reported values of absolute bending moment and forces must be considered approximations, accurate to no better than a factor of two (Taylor, 1997).…”
Section: Star Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many whiskers are often missing from cohabitating mice, due to trimming associated with social hierarchy in C57/BL6 mice [46]. The progressive length of whiskers across the pad [13] prevents short whiskers from reaching distant objects. Rodents use tactile feedback to adapt their whisking pattern, minimizing impingement during object contact [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodents can determine the location of objects by active exploration with whiskers [8], even when head fixed [9]. High-speed videography [10] and physical models [11][12][13][14] can quantify motion and forces that drive whisker input with submillisecond resolution during behavior [15,16]. This input is transformed and integrated in a topographic arrangement of columns in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) that have a one-to-one mapping to individual whiskers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the possibility that rodents could use vibration as a cue for distance to object. However, rodent whiskers are approximately conical [ 14 , 15 ], with the center of mass one quarter length from the whisker base. This provides conical whiskers with distinct vibrational properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%