2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory performance is related to intrinsic resting state functional connectivity changes in community-dwelling elderly cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 ). The significant predictability of WMC in the old sample from the RSFC patterns of multiple networks (WM, CogAC, VigAtt, ToM, SM, eSAD, Motor + PS and Motor + SS) extends previous aging research that revealed age differences in univariate associations between WM performance and RSNs ( Charroud et al, 2016 ; Jockwitz et al, 2017 ; Sala-Llonch et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 ). The significant predictability of WMC in the old sample from the RSFC patterns of multiple networks (WM, CogAC, VigAtt, ToM, SM, eSAD, Motor + PS and Motor + SS) extends previous aging research that revealed age differences in univariate associations between WM performance and RSNs ( Charroud et al, 2016 ; Jockwitz et al, 2017 ; Sala-Llonch et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…While the neural underpinnings of age-related deficits in cognitive functions were found to be associated with activation differences in task-related brain networks ( Cabeza et al, 2016a ; Hedden, 2007 ; Nielson et al, 2006 ), several findings have demonstrated that age-related WM decline may in part be accounted for by changes in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) architecture of the brain ( Charroud et al, 2016 ; Jockwitz et al, 2017 ; Sala-Llonch et al, 2012 ). It remains unclear, however, to which extent neurobehavioral features of aging manifest in individual differences in WM capacity (WMC) associated with variations in interregional coupling at rest across different cognitive networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each identified network was represented by one ICA component; therefore, a total of seven components were included in the analysis. These resting-state networks were chosen because they have previously been identified as relating to working memory performance (Engstrom et al 2013;Sala-Llonch et al 2012;Hampson et al 2006;Charroud et al 2016;Fang et al 2016). The strength of connectivity within individual networks was derived from the z-scored spatial maps and will be referred to as intra-network rsfc.…”
Section: Imaging Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Default D; (11). Default E; (12). Default F; This set of matrices shows the average correlations between the functional connectivity score and cognitive outcomes for each sub-network.…”
Section: Executive Function Vs Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While stronger connectivity within each of the TPN and TNN has been associated with better executive functions and working memory, the studies investigating the interactions between the two networks are limited and have produced discordant results [2,[7][8][9]. While some studies report interactions between the TPN and TNN in cognitive outcomes, others do not report such results [10][11][12]. Nevertheless, regional activation studies have found that the TPN activation and TNN deactivation during tasks is associated with better cognitive performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%