Complicating Counterspaces: Intersectionality and the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival

Abstract

The counterspaces framework articulated by Case and Hunter (2012), follows from community psychology's long-standing interest in the potential for settings to promote well-being and liberatory responses to oppression. This framework proposes that certain settings (i.e., "counterspaces") facilitate a specific set of processes that promote the well-being of marginalized groups. We argue that an intersectional analysis is crucial to understand whether and how counterspaces achieve these goals. We draw from literature on safe spaces and present a case study of the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival (Michfest) to illustrate the value of an intersectional analysis and explore how these processes operate. Based on 20 in-person interviews, 23 responses to an online survey, and ethnographic field notes, we show how Michfest was characterized by a particular intersection of identities at the setting level, and intersectional diversity complicated experiences at the individual level. Moreover, intersectional identities provided opportunities for dialogue and change at the setting level, including the creation of counterspaces within counterspaces. Overall, we demonstrate the need to attend to intersectionality in counterspaces, and more broadly in how we conceptualize settings in community psychology.

Reflexivity in Counterspaces Fieldwork

“…In light of growing research on counterspaces (Case & Hunter, ; Hasford, ; McConnell, Todd, Odahl‐Ruan & Shattell, ), the goal of this article is to explore the potential of reflexivity to help researchers recognize and navigate ethically important moments in counterspaces fieldwork. To this end, I recount my fieldwork within a counterspace for African‐American youth, most of whom had been incarcerated.…”

Race-Related Social Contextual Factors, Substance Use, and HIV Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in Chicago

“…Social power and privilege shaped these dynamics, such that participants often reported not having to think about or be aware of their dominant identities (e.g., White, traditionally masculine, straight passing) but experiencing pervasive influences related to their marginalized identities (e.g., Black or Latino, gay or bisexual, gender nonconforming, violating body image norms). Consistent with intersectionality theory, participants also identified ways in which their experiences of these identities shaped each other and varied depending on the context and the relative salience of different identities (Bowleg, 2008;McConnell, Janulis, Phillips, Truong, & Birkett, 2018;McConnell, Todd, Odahl-Ruan, & Shattell, 2016;Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008;Williams & Fredrick, 2015).…”

From victims to citizens: Emerging activist identities in the anti‐fracking movement in Bulgaria

“…With an increased awareness of diversity within communities, the concept of "we" is examined critically (Wiesenfeld, 1996) and multiple identities (within and across individuals) are recognized. Identities in this vein of research are interchanging, more related to changing roles and contexts, hierarchically nested or intersectional (Brodsky & Marx, 2001;McConnell, Todd, Odahl-Ruan, & Shattell, 2016). In social movement research the term multimilitancy is used to describe how activists circulate in different groups and movements with provisional commitment and thus various identities interchange and intersect (Flesher Fominaya, 2010;Melucci, 1995).…”