Characterizing Floral Symmetry in the Core Goodeniaceae with Geometric Morphometrics

Abstract

Core Goodeniaceae is a clade of ~330 species primarily distributed in Australia. Considerable variation in flower morphology exists within this group and we aim to use geometric morphometrics to characterize this variation across the two major subclades: Scaevola sensu lato (s.l.) and Goodenia s.l., the latter of which was hypothesized to exhibit greater variability in floral symmetry form. We test the hypothesis that floral morphological variation can be adequately characterized by our morphometric approach, and that discrete groups of floral symmetry morphologies exist, which broadly correlate with subjectively determined groups. From 335 images of 44 species in the Core Goodeniaceae, two principal components were computed that describe >98% of variation in all datasets. Increasing values of PC1 ventralize the dorsal petals (increasing the angle between them), whereas increasing values of PC2 primarily ventralize the lateral petals (decreasing the angle between them). Manipulation of these two morphological “axes” alone was sufficient to recreate any of the general floral symmetry patterns in the Core Goodeniaceae. Goodenia s.l. exhibits greater variance than Scaevola s.l. in PC1 and PC2, and has a significantly lower mean value for PC1. Clustering clearly separates fan-flowers (with dorsal petals at least 120° separated) from the others, whereas the distinction between pseudo-radial and bilabiate clusters is less clear and may form a continuum rather than two distinct groups. Transitioning from the average fan-flower to the average non-fan-flower is described almost exclusively by PC1, whereas PC2 partially describes the transition between bilabiate and pseudo-radial morphologies. Our geometric morphometric method accurately models Core Goodeniaceae floral symmetry diversity.

A robust, high‐throughput method for computing maize ear, cob, and kernel attributes automatically from images

“…Some counting methods, like that developed for quantifying bacterial colonies on the surfaces of Petri plates, rely on shape assumptions (Geissmann, 2013) but the counting method described here does not. The Bayesian method for finding the kernel tip is another generally applicable algorithm; it could be used to find a unique position in the contour of non-biological objects, or other plant structures such as leaves and flowers where contour shape has proven useful in evolutionary studies of morphology (Chitwood et al, 2016;Gardner et al, 2016;Rose et al, 2016).…”

Phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental heterogeneity contributes to fluctuating asymmetry in plants: first empirical evidence

“…Compared to other studies on plant asymmetry, the present study is unique in that the compass orientations of the flower parts were recorded. Previous studies have defined asymmetry in relation to plant architecture, such as the adaxial–abaxial axis of flowers (Savriama et al ., ; Baranov & Gavrikov, ; Gardner et al ., ) or the left–right asymmetry of leaves (Pélabon et al ., ; Chitwood et al ., ; Martinez et al ., ), but did not record compass orientation of plant organs, and therefore would have included asymmetries according to orientation as a component of FA. There might be directional asymmetry within the flowers in relation to plant architecture in Iris pumila too, as there is a consistent arrangement of the flower parts relative to the spathe subtending the flower (pers.obs.…”

The evolution of floral ontogenetic allometry in the Andean genus Caiophora (Loasaceae, subfam. Loasoideae)

“…Duplication, loss or merging of floral structures, homeotic changes of flower organs, and changes in flower symmetry are among the mechanisms that enabled floral structure to evolve (Becker, Alix, & Damerval, ; Endress, ; Glover, Airoldi, Brockington, Fernández‐Mazuecos, & Martínez‐Pérez, ). Even among taxa that share the same floral bauplan, evolutionary changes in the sizes, shapes, and arrangement of floral structures produced extensive variation in floral morphology (Gardner et al, ; Gómez, Torices, Lorite, Klingenberg, & Perfectti, ; McCarthy et al, ). These changes were accompanied by alterations of floral development, which were reflected in the respective patterns of ontogenetic allometry, the association between size and shape during development.…”