2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesogenic Retail Food Environments Around New Zealand Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the implication from this research for schools, focuses on reducing opportunities for children to purchase unhealthy food and drink via recommended travel routes. The existence of the location of unhealthy food outlets around NZ schools is well established (Day and Pearce 2011;Vandevijvere et al 2016;Egli et al 2018). For school travel plans and services like walking school buses purposely planning routes that do not familiarise children to shops selling unhealthy food and drink and do not provide them opportunities for purchasing unhealthy food could be important considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the implication from this research for schools, focuses on reducing opportunities for children to purchase unhealthy food and drink via recommended travel routes. The existence of the location of unhealthy food outlets around NZ schools is well established (Day and Pearce 2011;Vandevijvere et al 2016;Egli et al 2018). For school travel plans and services like walking school buses purposely planning routes that do not familiarise children to shops selling unhealthy food and drink and do not provide them opportunities for purchasing unhealthy food could be important considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, features of interest such as parks and the location of unhealthy food outlets were included in the map to 'crystallise' findings and provide context to results of the qualitative content analysis. Existing data from Vandevijvere et al (2016) were used to map unhealthy food outlets, defined as those that were classed as fast food, convenience or take-away stores. Finally, unhealthy food advertisements, described in detail in earlier NfAK research, were also added to the map, as advertising of unhealthy food influences normalisation of consumption for children (Sadeghirad et al 2016).…”
Section: Mapping Neighbourhood Destinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher accessibility was also observed for both convenience stores and supermarkets in the most deprived communities compared to the least deprived communities (Pearce et al 2008b). A recent national study explored proximity of unhealthy food retailers to schools and found approximately 68% urban schools had a convenience store within 800 m. Access to unhealthy foods through Fast Food/Takeaway or Convenience (FFTC) outlets was greater for the most deprived schools versus the least deprived schools (Vandevijvere et al 2016). Pearce et al (Day et al 2013) found that between 1966 and 2006, the median number of supermarkets/grocery stores within 800 m of schools decreased from 5 to 1, convenience stores decreased from 2 to 1, and fast food outlets increased from 1 to 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, researchers are recognising the potential for a reduction in obesity through food policy, particularly in relation to the advertising and availability of unhealthy foods in close proximity to schools. The IMD and the education domain in particular may be used to roll‐out regulatory‐based initiatives, in which the most deprived 5%, 10%, or 20% of neighbourhoods could be used to in the initial stages, followed by appropriate evaluations to see the impact such regulations have on childhood obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%