2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diatom-based biological condition gradient (BCG) approach for assessing impairment and developing nutrient criteria for streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BCG approach assigns taxa to different levels representing stream ecological conditions from natural to highly disturbed (Davies and Jackson, 2006). This approach has recently been applied using diatoms in the northeastern United States and is currently under further development and regional refinement (Hausmann et al, 2016; S. Spaulding, personal communication, 2017). It is somewhat analogous to trophic diatom indices developed in Europe to assign streams to different trophic statuses according to diatom assemblage structure (Besse‐Lototskaya et al, 2011), but rather than trophic condition, BCG attributes are designed to provide classification of overall stream impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BCG approach assigns taxa to different levels representing stream ecological conditions from natural to highly disturbed (Davies and Jackson, 2006). This approach has recently been applied using diatoms in the northeastern United States and is currently under further development and regional refinement (Hausmann et al, 2016; S. Spaulding, personal communication, 2017). It is somewhat analogous to trophic diatom indices developed in Europe to assign streams to different trophic statuses according to diatom assemblage structure (Besse‐Lototskaya et al, 2011), but rather than trophic condition, BCG attributes are designed to provide classification of overall stream impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BCG approach assigns taxa to different levels representing stream ecological conditions from natural to highly disturbed (Davies and Jackson, 2006). This approach has recently been applied using diatoms in the northeastern United States and is currently under further development and regional refinement (Hausmann et al, 2016;S. Spaulding, personal communication, 2017).…”
Section: Assemblage Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, an approach based on the major functional switch from clear water to a turbid state was recently developed for shallow lakes (Poikane et al, 2014a). Hausmann et al (2016) used Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis (TITAN; Baker and King, 2010) to determine diatom-assemblage change points, and related these to nutrient concentrations and Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) levels. In those cases when no other approach is available, boundaries can be set by dividing the ecological impact gradient in five equal classes (EC, 2003).…”
Section: Ecological Rationale For Setting Good Status Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 9th meeting breaks with tradition by including both rivers and lakes within its ambit, recognizing that many of the processes which influence the condition of algal assemblages in lake littoral zones and shallow rivers are similar (Cantonati and Lowe, 2014) and the methods adopted for their assessment also show considerable overlap (DeNicola and Kelly et al, 2014). The papers in the special series of papers allow a comparison with current approaches in the USA (Hausmann et al, 2016;Tang et al, 2016), present new methods for the assessment of acidification and ecological status (Juggins et al, 2016;Kelly et al, 2016b), discuss the importance of quantitative estimates of headwater stream productivity, provide tools for better management of petrifying springs (Cantonati et al, 2016), critically review the utility of phytobenthos for lake assessments (Kelly et al, 2016a), and test the utility of functional measures (such as biofilm phosphorus uptake capacity, PUC; Proia et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rimet 2012; Kelly et al 2014), with the Water Framework Directive, and the US (e.g. Barbour et al 1999;Potapova & Charles 2007;Haussmann et al 2016), with the Clean Water Act. Until now standard methods for freshwater ecological assessment based on diatoms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%