2016
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative density dependence is stronger in resource‐rich environments and diversifies communities when stronger for common but not rare species

Abstract: Conspecific negative density dependence is thought to maintain diversity by limiting abundances of common species. Yet the extent to which this mechanism can explain patterns of species diversity across environmental gradients is largely unknown. We examined density-dependent recruitment of seedlings and saplings and changes in local species diversity across a soil-resource gradient for 38 woody-plant species in a temperate forest. At both life stages, the strength of negative density dependence increased with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
120
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
12
120
2
Order By: Relevance
“…EDDM may reconcile contrasting findings for the relationship between the strength of CNDD and species abundance (Klironomos 2002;Comita et al 2010;Mangan et al 2010;Kobe and Vriesendorp 2011;Johnson et al 2012;Bagchi et al 2014, Zhu et al 2015LaManna et al 2016). For example, Zhu et al (2015) showed that rare species experienced weaker density-dependent effects, contrasting with the results of an earlier study using data from the same forest inventory (Johnson et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EDDM may reconcile contrasting findings for the relationship between the strength of CNDD and species abundance (Klironomos 2002;Comita et al 2010;Mangan et al 2010;Kobe and Vriesendorp 2011;Johnson et al 2012;Bagchi et al 2014, Zhu et al 2015LaManna et al 2016). For example, Zhu et al (2015) showed that rare species experienced weaker density-dependent effects, contrasting with the results of an earlier study using data from the same forest inventory (Johnson et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We suggest that approaches like EDDM that account for heterogeneity in local conspecific density, incorporating densities recorded across all measured plots to make demographic predictions, provide a stronger ability to link local, heterogeneous survival dynamics to community-scale outcomes of CNDD. Applying such approaches across other life stages and vital rates would broaden understanding of the full demographic influence of CNDD on plant populations and may reveal contrasting patterns across life stages (LaManna et al 2016) or tradeoffs that operate across different aspects of plant performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results align remarkably well with those of several related studies in terms of broad findings and species‐specific results. Three recent papers used observational approaches to compare conspecific and heterospecific effects across tree species in the eastern United States (Johnson et al., ; LaManna, Walton, Turner, & Myers, ; Zhu et al. ), and all found that negative conspecific effects were more common and/or stronger than positive conspecific effects or any type of heterospecific effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, variation in the strength of conspecific and phylogenetic neighborhood effects likely occurs within sites, including spatial, temporal, and/or among-species variation (e.g. Comita et al 2010, Zhu et al 2015, LaManna et al 2016. A better understanding of conspecific and phylogenetic neighborhood effects could be gained by future studies examining variation within sites and testing whether interspecific differences in the strength of neighborhood effects are linked to species traits.…”
Section: Accepted Ar Ticlementioning
confidence: 99%