2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New 13 Million Year Old Gavialoid Crocodylian from Proto-Amazonian Mega-Wetlands Reveals Parallel Evolutionary Trends in Skull Shape Linked to Longirostry

Abstract: Gavialoid crocodylians are the archetypal longirostrine archosaurs and, as such, understanding their patterns of evolution is fundamental to recognizing cranial rearrangements and reconstructing adaptive pathways associated with elongation of the rostrum (longirostry). The living Indian gharial Gavialis gangeticus is the sole survivor of the group, thus providing unique evidence on the distinctive biology of its fossil kin. Yet phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary ecology spanning ~70 million-years of l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Moroccan gavialoids are the westernmost known gavialoids from the Eocene. These discoveries could be of particular importance, because the earliest known South American gavialoids are from the latest Eocene (Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016). The Eocene and the Oligocene are particularly important in the dispersal of gavialoids because the split between South American and Asian clades of gavialoids could date from the late Eocene-Oligocene (Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Paleobiogeographic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Moroccan gavialoids are the westernmost known gavialoids from the Eocene. These discoveries could be of particular importance, because the earliest known South American gavialoids are from the latest Eocene (Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016). The Eocene and the Oligocene are particularly important in the dispersal of gavialoids because the split between South American and Asian clades of gavialoids could date from the late Eocene-Oligocene (Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Paleobiogeographic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discoveries could be of particular importance, because the earliest known South American gavialoids are from the latest Eocene (Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016). The Eocene and the Oligocene are particularly important in the dispersal of gavialoids because the split between South American and Asian clades of gavialoids could date from the late Eocene-Oligocene (Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016). Moreover, phylogenetic relationships suggest strong connections between basal South American gavialoids, Eogavialis africanum, and the Moroccan Argochampsa krebsi Hua andJouve, 2004.…”
Section: Paleobiogeographic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works that use geometric morphometrics for studying crocodylomorph cranial shape have mostly focused on specific subgroups, especially crocodylians (Monteiro et al ., 1997; Pierce et al ., 2008; Sadleir & Makovicky, 2008; Piras et al ., 2009, 2010, 2014; Pearcy & Wijtten, 2011; Watanabe & Slice, 2014; Okamoto et al ., 2015; Clarac et al ., 2016; Salas-Gismondi et al ., 2016, 2018; Iijima, 2017; McCurry et al ., 2017 a ; Foth et al ., 2017; Bona et al ., 2018; Fernandez Blanco et al ., 2018; Morris et al ., 2019), but also thalattosuchians (Pierce et al ., 2009; Young et al ., 2010) and notosuchians (Godoy et al ., 2018). One important exception is the recent work of Wilberg (2017), that assessed cranial shape variation across Crocodyliformes (which is only slightly less inclusive than Crocodylomorpha; Irmis et al ., 2013), sampling a large number of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the skull, and particularly the rostrum, has long been considered both an important phylogenetic and ecomorphological feature in crocodylians (Busbey, 1995;Daniel & McHenry, 2001;Brochu, 2001;Sadleir & Makovicky, 2008;Salas-Gismondi et al, 2016;Drumheller, Wilberg, & Sadlier, 2016;Wilberg, 2017). We attempted to determine if there was a correlation between tooth morphology and head shape, as these traits may be linked.…”
Section: Skull Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%