2016
DOI: 10.1160/th15-11-0892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact and course of major bleeding with edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonists

Abstract: Edoxaban is a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The Hokusai-VTE study revealed that, after initial treatment with heparin, edoxaban was non-inferior to and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This is the first report on the clinical relevance and management of bleeding events with edoxaban. All major bleeding events were classified blindly by three study-independent adjudicators. Pre-defined criteria were used to classify… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 13 A safety analysis for the major bleeding events in the Hokusai-VTE study described no significant difference in severity or clinical course in major bleeding with edoxaban compared to enoxaparin/warfarin. 22 Of the major bleeding events in the trial, 54% related to edoxaban were considered milder at the time of presentation compared to 42% of bleeding events with VKA, however, not statistically significant. More severe clinical presentation was also numerically less in the edoxaban group (46%) than the VKA group (58%) but not statistically significant (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.30–1.27; P =0.19).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Bleeding Events From Randomized Clinical Trialmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 13 A safety analysis for the major bleeding events in the Hokusai-VTE study described no significant difference in severity or clinical course in major bleeding with edoxaban compared to enoxaparin/warfarin. 22 Of the major bleeding events in the trial, 54% related to edoxaban were considered milder at the time of presentation compared to 42% of bleeding events with VKA, however, not statistically significant. More severe clinical presentation was also numerically less in the edoxaban group (46%) than the VKA group (58%) but not statistically significant (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.30–1.27; P =0.19).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Bleeding Events From Randomized Clinical Trialmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, there was a nonsignificant trend toward milder presentation and course in the edoxaban group. 22 …”
Section: Evaluation Of Bleeding Events From Randomized Clinical Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All major bleeding events were classified using two classification schemes that were developed and published previously . The first classification was used to assess the severity of the major bleeding event at presentation (Table S2A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second classification was used to assess the applied procedures and interventions for treatment and the clinical outcome of the bleeding event (Table S2B). Both classification schemes consist of four different categories, with one being the mildest and four the most severe …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and L.J.S.) using predefined criteria (Supporting Information Table S1), as previously described 12, 13, 14. In short, the first classification assessed the severity of the abnormal vaginal bleeding event at the moment of presentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%