2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose distribution in functional heart regions from tangential breast cancer radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RIHD following chest RT has been recognized fact and demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. The choice of treatment and tumor location has significant influence on RIHD16, 17. At the present stage, chemotherapy is a risk factor for RIHD, anthracycline had evident effects on RIHD18.…”
Section: The Common Types Of Rihdmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…RIHD following chest RT has been recognized fact and demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. The choice of treatment and tumor location has significant influence on RIHD16, 17. At the present stage, chemotherapy is a risk factor for RIHD, anthracycline had evident effects on RIHD18.…”
Section: The Common Types Of Rihdmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of this, exploring the dose to individual cardiac substructures is important (6,9). Indeed, it is currently unknown how much radiation dose is safe to administer to the heart under these circumstances (25).…”
Section: Radiotherapy-induced Cardiac Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation therapy dose to various cardiac substructures has been associated with coronary artery, pericardial, and conduction system diseases as well as cardiomyopathy (8). For breast cancer, the radiation dose distribution to various heart regions has been well-described (9). In addition, a recent study demonstrated a clinically-relevant dose-effect relationship between mean heart dose (MHD), left ventricle volume receiving 5 Gy and acute coronary events (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences may arise from the discrepancy in the total dose prescription and the size of the radiation field, CTV definition and size, OAR contouring, including diameter of the coronary arteries and LV thickness, the lack of detailed heart contouring atlases, individual coronary topology, heart size, body mass index, CWS distance, and finally radiotherapy technique used. 9,33,[49][50][51][52] The use of contrast agent 53 or automatic substructures' segmentation without 54 or with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 55 could improve contouring consistency, but these technical solutions are unlikely to be widely adopted in the near future. Non-automatic contouring is feasible as showed in a study by Francolini et al Authors made multiple comparisons of delineated cardiac chambers and 5 left LV wall segments according to aforementioned cardiac atlas 24 and confirmed high interobserver delineation consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%