2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stronks, Versnel, Prijs, Grolman, & Klis () have also reported that, compared with normal‐hearing animals, the suppression of CAP induced by intracochlear electrical stimulation was significantly less in animals with high‐frequency hearing loss. This can, to some extent, explain the discrepancy between the clinical trials mentioned above (Brown et al, ; Coco et al, ; Telmesani & Said, ) and our present study. The findings observed in the present research were based on acute electrical stimulation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stronks, Versnel, Prijs, Grolman, & Klis () have also reported that, compared with normal‐hearing animals, the suppression of CAP induced by intracochlear electrical stimulation was significantly less in animals with high‐frequency hearing loss. This can, to some extent, explain the discrepancy between the clinical trials mentioned above (Brown et al, ; Coco et al, ; Telmesani & Said, ) and our present study. The findings observed in the present research were based on acute electrical stimulation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Notably, different findings were reported by a few clinical trials in human subjects. Several articles have demonstrated that no change was observed for ECAP threshold after long‐term use of CI (Coco et al, ; Telmesani & Said, ), or even if there were changes, the magnitude of changes was small in view of the long observation interval (Brown, Abbas, Etlert, O'Brient, & Oleson, ), suggesting that electrical stimulation has no significant adverse effect on the response of auditory nerve. It should be noted that the auditory nerve states of the subjects in their studies were abnormal to varying degrees, whereas the functional states of the auditory nerve in our study were normal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, intraoperative ECAP thresholds showed correlations with the BCNC width and CSV of the CN in some electrodes (electrodes 1, 4 and 6). This may be non‐specific because ECAP thresholds were high intraoperatively and decreased significantly after fitting of the implant . Second, MAP data were relevant only to the CSV of the CN and not to BCNC width.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Порог ECAP используется чаще всего для настройки речевого процессора, особенно у детей с ограниченным слуховым опытом. [24].…”
Section: телеметрия нервного ответаunclassified