2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525505113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial structure of neuronal receptive field in awake monkey secondary visual cortex (V2)

Abstract: Visual processing depends critically on the receptive field (RF) properties of visual neurons. However, comprehensive characterization of RFs beyond the primary visual cortex (V1) remains a challenge. Here we report fine RF structures in secondary visual cortex (V2) of awake macaque monkeys, identified through a projection pursuit regression analysis of neuronal responses to natural images. We found that V2 RFs could be broadly classified as V1-like (typical Gaborshaped subunits), ultralong (subunits with high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
46
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(67 reference statements)
8
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 8 d,f, it is obvious that shape feedback reinforces the desired contours by accounting for the impact of global shapes feedback sent from area V2 to V1 on local contours, e.g., the luminance of airplane contours is higher in the latter one. This is in line with previously findings and experimental results in [ 32 , 42 ] that feedback connections may amplify the features extracted in V1. Comparing “BIHCD model” with “No V2 feedback” results, it can tell us that multi-feature suppression and integration method under the guidance of multi-scale information helps constantly suppress texture boundaries, enhance contour of small target and also keep contour of large target, e.g., the cluttered textures and inner boundaries in the deer.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Figure 8 d,f, it is obvious that shape feedback reinforces the desired contours by accounting for the impact of global shapes feedback sent from area V2 to V1 on local contours, e.g., the luminance of airplane contours is higher in the latter one. This is in line with previously findings and experimental results in [ 32 , 42 ] that feedback connections may amplify the features extracted in V1. Comparing “BIHCD model” with “No V2 feedback” results, it can tell us that multi-feature suppression and integration method under the guidance of multi-scale information helps constantly suppress texture boundaries, enhance contour of small target and also keep contour of large target, e.g., the cluttered textures and inner boundaries in the deer.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In 2016, Pu’s team used a combination of optical imaging information and an electro-physiological method to obtain a V2 neuron receptive field model [ 42 ], from which the high-resolution spatial structure of the V2 receptive field was obtained and divided the receptive fields of the V2 nerve cells into three categories: a type similar to the V1-cell receptive field; slender type; and complex structure type (containing multi-oriented components). The structures of the receptive field for these V2 cells can be explained by the integration of the V1-cell receptive field.…”
Section: The Bihcd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of position invariance also improves predictive power on novel data sets compared to the model with no position invariance10, on average by a factor of 1.5. While the correlation numbers are lower than those have been recently reported in higher visual areas such as V4 (refs 36, 56), we note that here the predictive power is computed with an explicit model that has a fixed nonlinearity rather than up to an arbitrary one-to-one nonlinearity56 or a linear36 transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our simulations (see Methods), a mixture of conjunctive and co-active representations would still show a conjunctive decoding pattern (Fig 7). Furthermore, it is unlikely that receptive fields in visual cortex are purely co-active or conjunctive (Liu et al, 2016). Future research should determine whether visual cortex does indeed exhibit both co-active and conjunctive representations.…”
Section: Mvpa With Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%