2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Monoclonal Antibody and Peptide Binders for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and Their Application for Magnetic Separation

Abstract: The generation of novel Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP)-specific monoclonal antibodies and phage-display derived peptide binders, along with their application for the magnetic separation (MS) of MAP cells, is described. Our aim was to achieve even greater MAP capture capability than is possible with peptide-mediated magnetic separation (PMS) using a 50:50 mix of biotinylated-aMp3 and biotinylated-aMptD peptide-coated beads. Gamma-irradiated whole MAP cells and ethanol extracted antigens (EEA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 , 2 , 3 and 4 should clearly demonstrate our decision-making in relation to these parameters, on the basis of conventional IS900 PCR testing immediately after PhMS. We had previously used this subjective evaluation approach to successfully optimise MS methods for MAP (Foddai et al 2010b ; O’Brien et al 2016 ) and Mycobacterium bovis (Stewart et al 2012 ). Our objective was to achieve similar or better MAP capture capability and detection sensitivity with the D29 phage-coated BcMag Tosylactivated beads as we had previously with biotinylated peptide-coated Tosylactivated Dynabeads, and we have done this (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 , 2 , 3 and 4 should clearly demonstrate our decision-making in relation to these parameters, on the basis of conventional IS900 PCR testing immediately after PhMS. We had previously used this subjective evaluation approach to successfully optimise MS methods for MAP (Foddai et al 2010b ; O’Brien et al 2016 ) and Mycobacterium bovis (Stewart et al 2012 ). Our objective was to achieve similar or better MAP capture capability and detection sensitivity with the D29 phage-coated BcMag Tosylactivated beads as we had previously with biotinylated peptide-coated Tosylactivated Dynabeads, and we have done this (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously published studies have detected 10–10 3 MAP /50 ml milk by decontamination and culture (Ayele, Svastova, Roubal, Bartos, & Pavlik, ; Giese & Ahrens, ; Sweeney, Whitlock, & Rosenberger, ) and 10 2 –10 4 MAP /50 ml milk by qPCR (Slana et al., ) or IS 900 PCR (Stabel, Bradner, Robbe‐Austerman, & Beitz, ). The PMS‐phage assay and PMS‐culture have sufficient analytical sensitivity (10–10 2 pfu/ml and 10 2 –10 3 cfu/ml, respectively; O'Brien et al., ) to be able to detect these low numbers of MAP in cow's milk. However, it is documented that MAP shedding into milk can be intermittent (Fecteau & Whitlock, ), and the number of MAP shed can vary by stage of infection, with clinical animals shedding higher numbers of MAP in their milk than subclinical animals (Stabel et al., ; Sweeney et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMS‐based methods employ paramagnetic beads coated with MAP ‐specific biotinylated aMp3 and aMptD peptides (Foddai, Elliot, & Grant, ) to selectively capture and concentrate low numbers of MAP cells from milk samples. The analytical specificity of the PMS assay applied to milk was previously determined to be >98%, with an analytical sensitivity for the PMS‐phage and PMS‐culture assays of 10–10 2 pfu/ml and 10 2 –10 3 cfu/ml, respectively (O'Brien, Stewart, Strain, & Grant, ). These methods have principally been developed and optimized for detection of MAP in milk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should, for instance, be possible to incubate different substrate peptides with clinical samples and upon subsequent extraction of the substrate peptides from the mixture (e.g. by coupling peptides to magnetic beads and subsequent magnetic separation, compare e.g [73].) the unphoshorylated levels of these peptides can be compared with the phosphorylated levels of these peptides.…”
Section: Peptide Arraying Remains Dominant For Kinome Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%