2017
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2016.2519686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Three Algorithms for the Segmentation of Overlapping Cervical Cells

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce and evaluate the systems submitted to the first Overlapping Cervical Cytology Image Segmentation Challenge, held in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2014. This challenge was organized to encourage the development and benchmarking of techniques capable of segmenting individual cells from overlapping cellular clumps in cervical cytology images, which is a prerequisite for the development of the next generation of computer-aided diagnosis systems … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the Herlev benchmark dataset [16], [17], the attained nucleus segmentation accuracy ranging between 0.85 [11] and 0.92 [15]. On an overlapping cervical cell dataset [13], the cytoplasm segmentation accuracy ranges from 0.87 to 0.89 [13]. On the other hand, most cell classification studies assume that accurate segmentations of individual cytoplasms and nuclei are already available [17]- [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the Herlev benchmark dataset [16], [17], the attained nucleus segmentation accuracy ranging between 0.85 [11] and 0.92 [15]. On an overlapping cervical cell dataset [13], the cytoplasm segmentation accuracy ranges from 0.87 to 0.89 [13]. On the other hand, most cell classification studies assume that accurate segmentations of individual cytoplasms and nuclei are already available [17]- [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the obtained T P p was 0.89, which was still higher than the T P p value obtained by [54] ISBI approach. For more evaluation, a qualitative comparison of the nuclei and cytoplasm segmentation of our approach and the ISBI approaches is provided in Figure 10 using the visual results provided by the ISBI organizers [56]. As seen in the figure, the proposed approach provided the best, and semi-optimal, segmentation for the overlapping cells in the first image.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cytoplasm Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative evaluation of the proposed approach and the ISBI challenge methods[56]. mation process, whereas the refinement and filtering time is the execution time for DRLSE-based refinement step and the false candidates filtering step.The proposed approach took 18 seconds on average to classify the Pap smear image to its cellular components, and approximately 10 seconds to segment each cell in the image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative unsupervised machine learning schemes in [21,26] proposed graph-based algorithms to segment the nucleus and cytoplasm of cervical cells with different degrees of overlap in seconds. Despite those methods continuing to be among the best algorithms, as discussed in [24], accuracies drop drastically when applied to conventional Pap smears. Section 4 presents unsupervised machine learning schemes that evolved from this previous work and addresses digitized Pap tests from real-world scenarios.…”
Section: Nucleus Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements on real cells segmentation [5,24] have shown new potential to analyze cervical cell using computer-aided systems for Pap tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%