The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of eight routine unpublished LC–MS/MS methods for the simultaneous measurement of testosterone and androstenedione in serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HA was diagnosed when an androgen parameter exceeded the limit of the local laboratory or when hirsutism was presented, but the methods used to test androgens vary greatly around the world, and there is currently no gold standard. LC-MS measurements [23,24] were recently proposed as a reliable measure for androgens, but the high cost and lack of clinical feasibility significantly hinder the clinical application of LC-MS. In addition, the phenotype classification method described in the NIH recommendations was also based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HA was diagnosed when an androgen parameter exceeded the limit of the local laboratory or when hirsutism was presented, but the methods used to test androgens vary greatly around the world, and there is currently no gold standard. LC-MS measurements [23,24] were recently proposed as a reliable measure for androgens, but the high cost and lack of clinical feasibility significantly hinder the clinical application of LC-MS. In addition, the phenotype classification method described in the NIH recommendations was also based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is very accurate, sensitive, and well standardized, as was shown in previous studies (7)(8)(9). Intraassay variation in both the female and male concentration range was 4%.…”
Section: Isotope Dilution Lc-ms/ms Methodmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In particular, reference ranges are still needed, especially in childhood, since steroid hormones change dramatically with age and pubertal stages and often differ between the sexes [14, 24, 25, 32]. Moreover, a lack of comparability of steroid hormone data due to differences in laboratory methods, even with various LC-MS/MS techniques [9, 33], hampers clinical and basic science studies in endocrine research. Therefore, standardized methods “simplifying” the display and interpretation of complex steroid data could improve diagnosis and research in endocrinology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%