2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of uranium distribution and speciation in mill tailings, COMINAK Mine, Niger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second set of samples comprised two components: a ground uranium ore and its related fresh tailing (Déjeant et al, 2016). The ore was sampled after grinding and before selective U extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second set of samples comprised two components: a ground uranium ore and its related fresh tailing (Déjeant et al, 2016). The ore was sampled after grinding and before selective U extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the maximum transmission distance cannot exceed several hundred meters, so the power consumption is often small, generally less than 100 mW. As long as a communication protocol technology is embedded between various electronic devices, data transmission and sharing can be realized in a short distance, which is very convenient 6,7 …”
Section: Mineral Remote Sensing Monitoring Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mill tailings were then stored near the ore processing plants, as is the case for mines operating today overseas (see for instance Déjeant et al (2016) for Niger and Robertson et al (2019) for Canada).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%