2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1523-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Gliomatosis cerebri: no evidence for a separate brain tumor entity

Abstract: The original version of this article contained errors in the alignment of several entries in Tables 4 and 5. The corrected Tables 4 and 5 are given below. The original article has been updated accordingly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the scientific consensus now is that there is no common pathologic and radiographic consensus for its diagnosis, and in 2016, GC was eliminated from current WHO classification [33]. The reason of the elimination was based on overlap of discrete molecular alterations with other malignant gliomas and the absence of specific molecular markers [34, 35]. Many histomorphological features similar to infiltrative gliomas support the contention that GC is one variety of diffuse glioma including GBM.…”
Section: Gliomatosis Cerebri and Gbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the scientific consensus now is that there is no common pathologic and radiographic consensus for its diagnosis, and in 2016, GC was eliminated from current WHO classification [33]. The reason of the elimination was based on overlap of discrete molecular alterations with other malignant gliomas and the absence of specific molecular markers [34, 35]. Many histomorphological features similar to infiltrative gliomas support the contention that GC is one variety of diffuse glioma including GBM.…”
Section: Gliomatosis Cerebri and Gbmmentioning
confidence: 99%