2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A small n sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design for use in rare disease research

Abstract: Background Clinical trials in rare diseases are difficult to conduct due to the limited number of patients available with each disorder. We developed a Phase 2 trial which is a small n sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (snSMART) design to test several treatments for a rare disease for which no standard therapy exists. Purpose This paper illustrate the design, sample size estimation and operating characteristics of an snSMART. Methods We investigate the performance of a class of weighted Z sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some adaptive designs are now used for rare cancers [ 53 ]. Other sequential adaptive methods are proposed for testing different therapeutic possibilities in a small population [ 54 , 55 ]. Regulators accept or recommend some of these designs [ 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some adaptive designs are now used for rare cancers [ 53 ]. Other sequential adaptive methods are proposed for testing different therapeutic possibilities in a small population [ 54 , 55 ]. Regulators accept or recommend some of these designs [ 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative effectiveness trial based at the University of Pennsylvania is attempting to identify which of azathioprine, colchicine, or dapsone is most effective in treatment of leukocytoclastic cutaneous vasculitis. These investigators have initially chosen a small n sequential multiple assessment randomized trial design (Tamura et al, 2016). We believe that adaptive trial principles will offer useful strategies for developing evidence-based treatment guidelines to improve patient care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workshop participants emphasized the need to evaluate any intervention critically with regard to the inclusion criteria and stratification of subjects, dose and duration of treatment, and study endpoints. The value of crossover designs, which allow patients to serve as their own control, was noted, as was the need for creative strategies to address studies with very small enrollments such as individualized “n=1” or small cohort trials [139]. …”
Section: Developing a Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%