2015
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpectralTDF: transition densities of diffusion processes with time-varying selection parameters, mutation rates and effective population sizes

Abstract: Motivation: In the Wright-Fisher diffusion, the transition density function describes the time evolution of the population-wide frequency of an allele. This function has several practical applications in population genetics and computing it for biologically realistic scenarios with selection and demography is an important problem. Results: We develop an efficient method for finding a spectral representation of the transition density function for a general model where the effective population size, selection co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Steinruecken et al . 29 recently showed how the transition density function of biallelic Wright-Fisher diffusions 30 could be approximately computed, eliminating the need for a variety of simulations (although allele age has not been considered in this framework). Here we have shown that even the exact computational analysis of biallelic Markov models (including Wright-Fisher models) can be made efficient enough to often eliminate the need for either simulations or diffusion approximations in the first place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Steinruecken et al . 29 recently showed how the transition density function of biallelic Wright-Fisher diffusions 30 could be approximately computed, eliminating the need for a variety of simulations (although allele age has not been considered in this framework). Here we have shown that even the exact computational analysis of biallelic Markov models (including Wright-Fisher models) can be made efficient enough to often eliminate the need for either simulations or diffusion approximations in the first place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Steinrücken et al (2015) showed that if the allele frequency density at time s in epoch is given by the expansion where are the coefficients encoding the density at time s in the basis of the eigenfunctions , then at time t in epoch , the allele frequency density is given by , where the coefficients are given by where is the time of the terminating boundary of epoch , and In equation (B.7) , and are given by where is defined in equation (A.13) and for an arbitrary collection of distinct values . In practice, we take to be the Chebyshev nodes ( Steinrücken et al 2015 ). By repeated application of equation (B.6) , it follows that if the coefficients encode the density at time s in epoch , then the coefficients encoding the density …”
Section: Diffusion Transition Densities: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we must use a formula for the transition density across multiple epochs of different sizes. Steinrücken et al (2015) showed that if the allele frequency density at time s in epoch is given by the expansion where are the coefficients encoding the density at time s in the basis of the eigenfunctions , then at time t in epoch , the allele frequency density is given by , where the coefficients are given by where is the time of the terminating boundary of epoch , and …”
Section: Diffusion Transition Densities: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most intriguing forces that shape the dynamics of genetic variants is natural or artificial selection, as it reflects how the population adapts to its environment. The Wright-Fisher model and its diffusion approximations are commonly used to model the dynamics of allele frequencies over time, especially when selection is acting, and they have been applied to analyze temporal genetic data ( e.g ., Bollback et al, 2008; Malaspinas et al, 2012; Mathieson and McVean, 2013; Steinrücken et al, 2014; Steinrücken et al, 2016; He et al, 2020). Nevertheless, despite several existing approaches to infer selection parameters, most analyze the data exclusively under a model of additive (semi-dominant) selection, and are often applied to time-series at specific loci, rather than genome-wide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%