Disruption of Spinal Noradrenergic Activation Delays Recovery of Acute Incision-Induced Hypersensitivity and Increases Spinal Glial Activation in the Rat
Abstract:Clinical studies suggest that descending inhibitory controls from the brainstem are important for speeding recovery from pain following surgery. We examined the effects of destroying spinally projecting noradrenergic neurons via intrathecally administered antibody to dopamine β-hydroxylase conjugated to saporin (DβH-saporin) on recovery in an acute incisional pain model. Mechanical and thermal paw withdrawal thresholds and non-evoked spontaneous guarding scores were tested for several weeks postoperatively and… Show more
“…This mirrors their anatomical segregation ( Li et al, 2016 ) and implies that the modules could be capable of independent action, with recruitment in different behavioural contexts. We speculate that it may be the balance between recruitment of the ‘restorative’ LC :SC limb versus the ‘alarmist’ LC :PFC projection that determines whether pain following an injury resolves or persists into chronic pain (see also [ Arora et al, 2016 ; Brightwell and Taylor, 2009 ; Taylor and Westlund, 2017 ]). Further the recruitment of either module may actually reciprocally inhibit the other given the a 2-adrenoceptor-mediated feedback inhibition within the locus coeruleus ( Aghajanian et al, 1977 ).…”
The locus coeruleus (LC) projects throughout the brain and spinal cord and is the major source of central noradrenaline. It remains unclear whether the LC acts functionally as a single global effector or as discrete modules. Specifically, while spinal-projections from LC neurons can exert analgesic actions, it is not known whether they can act independently of ascending LC projections. Using viral vectors taken up at axon terminals, we expressed chemogenetic actuators selectively in LC neurons with spinal (LC:SC) or prefrontal cortex (LC:PFC) projections. Activation of the LC:SC module produced robust, lateralised anti-nociception while activation of LC:PFC produced aversion. In a neuropathic pain model, LC:SC activation reduced hind-limb sensitisation and induced conditioned place preference. By contrast, activation of LC:PFC exacerbated spontaneous pain, produced aversion and increased anxiety-like behaviour. This independent, contrasting modulation of pain-related behaviours mediated by distinct noradrenergic neuronal populations provides evidence for a modular functional organisation of the LC.
“…This mirrors their anatomical segregation ( Li et al, 2016 ) and implies that the modules could be capable of independent action, with recruitment in different behavioural contexts. We speculate that it may be the balance between recruitment of the ‘restorative’ LC :SC limb versus the ‘alarmist’ LC :PFC projection that determines whether pain following an injury resolves or persists into chronic pain (see also [ Arora et al, 2016 ; Brightwell and Taylor, 2009 ; Taylor and Westlund, 2017 ]). Further the recruitment of either module may actually reciprocally inhibit the other given the a 2-adrenoceptor-mediated feedback inhibition within the locus coeruleus ( Aghajanian et al, 1977 ).…”
The locus coeruleus (LC) projects throughout the brain and spinal cord and is the major source of central noradrenaline. It remains unclear whether the LC acts functionally as a single global effector or as discrete modules. Specifically, while spinal-projections from LC neurons can exert analgesic actions, it is not known whether they can act independently of ascending LC projections. Using viral vectors taken up at axon terminals, we expressed chemogenetic actuators selectively in LC neurons with spinal (LC:SC) or prefrontal cortex (LC:PFC) projections. Activation of the LC:SC module produced robust, lateralised anti-nociception while activation of LC:PFC produced aversion. In a neuropathic pain model, LC:SC activation reduced hind-limb sensitisation and induced conditioned place preference. By contrast, activation of LC:PFC exacerbated spontaneous pain, produced aversion and increased anxiety-like behaviour. This independent, contrasting modulation of pain-related behaviours mediated by distinct noradrenergic neuronal populations provides evidence for a modular functional organisation of the LC.
“…Importantly active noradrenergic mechanisms at the spinal cord level speed the recovery from hypersensitivity of rodents following a surgical incision (Arora et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Arora et al . ). This particular inhibitory control was proposed to derive from the subnucleus reticularis dorsalis (SRD) (Bouhassira et al .…”
Descending controls, comprising pathways that originate in midbrain and brainstem regions and project onto the spinal cord, have long been recognised as key links in the multiple neural networks that interact to produce the overall pain experience. There is clear evidence from preclinical and clinical studies that both peripheral and central sensitisation play important roles in determining the level of pain perceived. Much emphasis has been put on spinal cord mechanisms in central excitability, but it is now becoming clear that spinal hyperexcitability can be regulated by descending pathways from the brain that originate from predominantly noradrenergic and serotonergic systems. One pain can inhibit another. In this respect diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) are a unique form of endogenous descending inhibitory pathway since they can be easily evoked and quantified in animals and man. The spinal pharmacology of pathways that subserve DNIC are complicated; in the normal situation these descending controls produce a final inhibitory effect through the actions of noradrenaline at spinal α -adrenoceptors, although serotonin, acting on facilitatory spinal 5-HT receptors, influences the final expression of DNIC also. These descending pathways are altered in neuropathy and the effects of excess serotonin may now become inhibitory through activation of spinal 5-HT receptors. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is the human counterpart of DNIC and requires a descending control also. Back and forward translational studies between DNIC and CPM, gauged between bench and bedside, are key for the development of analgesic therapies that exploit descending noradrenergic and serotonergic control pathways.
“…This mirrors their anatomical segregation (Li et al, 2016) and implies that the modules could be capable of independent action, with recruitment in different behavioural contexts. We speculate that it may be the balance between recruitment of the 'restorative' LC :SC limb versus the 'alarmist' LC :PFC projection that determines whether pain following an injury resolves or persists into chronic pain (see also (Arora et al, 2016, Brightwell and Taylor, 2009, Taylor and Westlund, 2017). Further the recruitment of either module may actually reciprocally inhibit the other given the a2-adrenoceptor-mediated feedback inhibition within the locus coeruleus (Aghajanian et al, 1977).…”
The locus coeruleus (LC) projects throughout the brain and spinal cord and is the major source of central noradrenaline. It remains unclear whether the LC acts functionally as a single global effector or as discrete modules. Specifically, while spinal-projections from LC neurons can exert analgesic actions, it is not known whether they can act independently of ascending LC projections. Using viral vectors taken up at axon terminals, we expressed chemogenetic actuators selectively in LC neurons with spinal (LC :SC ) or prefrontal cortex (LC :PFC ) projections. Activation of the LC :SC module produced robust, lateralised analgesia while activation of LC :PFC produced aversion. In a neuropathic pain model, LC :SC activation reduced hind-limb sensitization and induced conditioned place preference. By contrast, activation of LC :PFC exacerbated spontaneous pain, produced aversion and increased anxiety-like behaviour. This independent, contrasting modulation of pain-related behaviours mediated by distinct noradrenergic modules provides evidence for a discrete functional organisation of the LC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.