The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.10.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered cerebellar-amygdala connectivity in violent offenders: A resting-state fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rs-fMRI technology is concerned with the neuronal activity in the absence of a task and has been used to indirectly measure neuronal activity [25, 26]. As a principal method for rs-fMRI, ReHo is emerging as an interesting biomarker for measuring the means of diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rs-fMRI technology is concerned with the neuronal activity in the absence of a task and has been used to indirectly measure neuronal activity [25, 26]. As a principal method for rs-fMRI, ReHo is emerging as an interesting biomarker for measuring the means of diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the BLA would convey more emotional-related information to be processed into the mPFC (Garcia et al, 1999;Senn et al, 2014), and is necessary to express fear-related behaviors such as freezing (Helmstetter and Bellgowan, 1994). Alterations of its connectivity in humans has already been suggested to underlie aggressive behaviors (Leutgeb et al, 2016).…”
Section: A Distributed Brain Network For Mood Control In Health and Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, including resting-state and task-related functional connectivity confirm cerebellar relationships between the cortical and subcortical areas involved in addiction, and specifically in craving. Concretely, co-activations and functional connections between cerebellum and cortical structures, such as dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Habas et al, 2009;Leutgeb et al, 2016;Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012), orbitofrontal cortex (Addis et al, 2016;Habas et al, 2009;Leutgeb et al, 2016), anterior cingulate cortex (Addis et al, 2016;Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2012), insula (Addis et al, 2016;Habas et al, 2009;Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012), and inferior frontal gyrus (Addis et , 2016;Moulton et al, 2011;Tomasi and Volkow, 2011) have been reported. Other subcortical structures such as amygdala (Leutgeb et al, 2016;Sang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2012), hippocampus (Onuki et al, 2015;Sang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2012), ventral tegmental area (Carnell et al, 2014;Etkin et al, 2009;Kline et al, 2016;Kwon et al, 2014), dorsal striatum (Moulton et al, 2011;Sang et al, 2012;Tomasi and Volkow, 2011), and ventral striatum (Cauda et al, 2011;Cservenka et al, 2014;Koehler et al, 2013) also have demonstrated to be connected to the cerebellum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%