The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement in the Evaluation of Tumor Vascularization With Computed Tomography Perfusion in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: For all Perf parameters intra-agreement was higher than interagreement, even though a relatively wide range of 95% limits of agreement was found in both cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be mentioned that our study has some limitations. We did perform consensus reading instead interreader evaluation of results [37]. There are several software with different underlying calculation models available and evaluation of the reading performance with different software/models was beyond the scope of our initial evaluation [38, 39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that our study has some limitations. We did perform consensus reading instead interreader evaluation of results [37]. There are several software with different underlying calculation models available and evaluation of the reading performance with different software/models was beyond the scope of our initial evaluation [38, 39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some limitations of our study deserve to be mentioned. We did perform consensus reading of results [ 21 ]. Patients with stenosis and occlusions were not evaluated separately due to the low number of individuals in the stenosis subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evaluations of observer variability in CTp have been undertaken in the brain 4 –6 and for tumors in a variety of body locations. 7 11 The lung is a major site for primary and metastatic tumors. 12 Unlike evaluations in the brain, lesions in body locations are susceptible to motion (breathing, cardiac movement, etc), which imposes additional challenges in delineating ROIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%