2015
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacogenetic allele nomenclature: International workgroup recommendations for test result reporting

Abstract: This manuscript provides nomenclature recommendations developed by an international workgroup to increase transparency and standardization of pharmacogenetic (PGx) result reporting. Presently, sequence variants identified by PGx tests are described using different nomenclature systems. In addition, PGx analysis may detect different sets of variants for each gene, which can affect interpretation of results. This practice has caused confusion and may thereby impede the adoption of clinical PGx testing. Standardi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
114
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(51 reference statements)
2
114
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, multiple studies focused on the pharmacogenetic variability in Jewish populations (online supplementary table 1). However, those studies only analysed limited subsets of preselected variants using divergent genotyping strategies, which can cause problems in genotype calling and complicate the integration of the results of different studies 38. Furthermore, they often probed rather small and heterogeneous cohorts, such as Israeli Jews who themselves constitute a mixture of Ashkenazi (47%), Sephardic (30%) and Oriental (23%) origin, limiting the expressiveness of the obtained results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, multiple studies focused on the pharmacogenetic variability in Jewish populations (online supplementary table 1). However, those studies only analysed limited subsets of preselected variants using divergent genotyping strategies, which can cause problems in genotype calling and complicate the integration of the results of different studies 38. Furthermore, they often probed rather small and heterogeneous cohorts, such as Israeli Jews who themselves constitute a mixture of Ashkenazi (47%), Sephardic (30%) and Oriental (23%) origin, limiting the expressiveness of the obtained results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Delphi method used (Figure 1), CPIC solicited pharmacogenetic experts by email invitation to members of CPIC, PGRN, pharmacogenetic-related working groups for the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen; https://www.clinicalgenome.org), Institute of Medicine (IOM) DIGITizE Action Collaborative (http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Activities/Research/GenomicBasedResearch/Innovation-Collaboratives/EHR.aspx), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PGx nomenclature workgroup, 13 Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH; http://ga4gh.org), ACMG (https://www.acmg.net), Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE; https://emerge.mc.vanderbilt.edu/), the CHAMP online resource for AMP members (http://champ.amp.org), and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). In addition, experts not included in the above groups were solicited by posting a description of the project on the PharmGKB website.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para cada enzima el alelo silvestre se designa como *1 y las variantes alélicas se numeran de manera secuencial según han sido identificadas (*2, *3, etc.) 30 . Es por estas variantes que la respuesta farmacológica o la susceptibilidad a la acción de tóxicos varía extraordinariamente entre diferentes individuos 31 (ver detalle en http://www.cypalleles.ki.se/).…”
Section: Biotransformación/metabolismo De Fármacosunclassified