2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of commercial MOSFET detectors and their feasibility for in-vivo HDR brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important dependence observed in our study was the angular dependence. In studies of similar detectors (TN502RD y TN1002RDH,RDI,RD), Pomije et al , Dong et al , Roshau and Hintenlang , Koivisto et al and Phurailatpam et al all used x‐ray devices of between 60 and 120 kVp, with HVL values ranging between 3.0 mmAl and 7.7 mmAl, except in the study by Pomije et al , which used a source of 192 Ir. Furthermore, the measurements were conducted in air, PMMA, and virtual water, and the increments in angle measurements ranged between π/36 radians and π/4 radians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The most important dependence observed in our study was the angular dependence. In studies of similar detectors (TN502RD y TN1002RDH,RDI,RD), Pomije et al , Dong et al , Roshau and Hintenlang , Koivisto et al and Phurailatpam et al all used x‐ray devices of between 60 and 120 kVp, with HVL values ranging between 3.0 mmAl and 7.7 mmAl, except in the study by Pomije et al , which used a source of 192 Ir. Furthermore, the measurements were conducted in air, PMMA, and virtual water, and the increments in angle measurements ranged between π/36 radians and π/4 radians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the aforementioned studies proposed the development of a mathematical model from the experimental data to allow correction for angular dependence, despite reporting mean values of up to 14.7% for measurements in air (maximum variation in angular sensitivity of 55%) and up to 9.7% for those in PMMA (maximum variation in angular sensitivity of 40%). Phurailatpam et al 16 used a virtual-water phantom and described a maximum difference in sensitivity of (9.9 AE 0.4)% (k = 1). Ramaseshan et al 12 performed measurements in a single plane [z = 0, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations