2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced pluripotent stem cells as a discovery tool for Alzheimer׳s disease

Abstract: The ability to accurately and systematically evaluate the cellular mechanisms underlying human neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) should lead to advancements in therapeutics. Recent developments in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have afforded the opportunity to use human neurons and glia to study cellular changes involved in neurological diseases. iPSCs have the potential to be differentiated into AD-relevant cell types, including forebrain neurons, astrocytes, and micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of causality should be pursued, although both in vitro systems such as human induced pluripotent stem cells differentiated to neurons [49] and in vivo murine or Drosophila models have limitations. In one example, an epigenomic profile of the CK-p25 mouse model, seems to have primarily indicated the presence of a large number of infiltrating myeloid cells, which may not be representative of other AD models [22] but may capture aspects of the human disease.…”
Section: Future Direction – Should We Study the Epigenome In Ad?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of causality should be pursued, although both in vitro systems such as human induced pluripotent stem cells differentiated to neurons [49] and in vivo murine or Drosophila models have limitations. In one example, an epigenomic profile of the CK-p25 mouse model, seems to have primarily indicated the presence of a large number of infiltrating myeloid cells, which may not be representative of other AD models [22] but may capture aspects of the human disease.…”
Section: Future Direction – Should We Study the Epigenome In Ad?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following in vitro differentiation, patient-derived hiPSCs provide disease-relevant somatic cells, which carry all the genetic elements implicated in the disease reflecting the genetic spectrum of the patient population. While discussing all of these studies is beyond the scope of this work, excellent recent reviews summarize hiPSC diseases models for neurodevelopmental (Ardhanareeswaran et al, 2017), neuropsychiatric (Hoffman et al, 2018) and neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (Sullivan and Young-Pearse, 2017) and Parkinson’s disease (Shi et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2017)), motor neuron and Huntington’s disease. The spectrum of phenotypes, which can be assessed in hiPSC-based in vitro models include a wide range of molecular, metabolic, cellular and electrophysiological analysis.…”
Section: Hpsc-based Models For Monogenetic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these are all affected in tauopathies, it is important to use models in which these aspects of tau biology replicate the biology of adult human brain. Studies in non-pathological resected human brain tissue and patient iPSC derived neural models may be the best experimental paradigms for achieving this 43,100,101 . .…”
Section: Studying Tauopathies In Human Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%