2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and characterization of Clostridium difficile isolated from dogs in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several factors could contribute to these apparent differences, including geographic area, laboratory methods and age and clinical history of dogs recruited to these studies. In our study toxigenic isolates accounted for 36% of positive cultures (n=22/61); previous studies have reported a prevalence of toxigenic isolates of 36.8% to 69% (20,22,24,27). The most commonly isolated ribotypes in our study cohort were ribotypes 039 and 010, followed by 020, a toxigenic ribotype that was recovered most frequently from non-diarrheic dogs (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several factors could contribute to these apparent differences, including geographic area, laboratory methods and age and clinical history of dogs recruited to these studies. In our study toxigenic isolates accounted for 36% of positive cultures (n=22/61); previous studies have reported a prevalence of toxigenic isolates of 36.8% to 69% (20,22,24,27). The most commonly isolated ribotypes in our study cohort were ribotypes 039 and 010, followed by 020, a toxigenic ribotype that was recovered most frequently from non-diarrheic dogs (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Results from published studies of C. difficile carriage by companion animals report prevalence rates in dogs from 0% to 58%, with a lower prevalence in healthy dogs (1719) and a higher prevalence reported in hospitalised dogs (20) and those visiting human hospitals (21). Similar ribotypes have been identified in both canines and humans suggesting potential for interspecies transmission (22,23). A small number of studies have looked at risk factors for C. difficile carriage in dogs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…While C. difficile infections in humans are well-studied and associated with antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, in dogs C. difficile and its toxins are detected in clinically healthy subjects, and infection cannot be induced in healthy dogs even after antibiotic therapy. In fact, one study (72) reported isolation rates of 29% in healthy volunteer dogs in Japan, and 35% in patients of a veterinary hospital in treatment for non-GI related conditions. However, other studies give more conservative isolation rates, with 5.5% of shelter dogs in Germany positive for C. difficile (73) and no isolates out of 55 healthy dogs in Canada (74).…”
Section: Gut Microbiome and Gi Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggesting that C. difficile was secondary to an underlying issue. Given the frequent identification of human epidemic PCRribotypes in dogs (72,77), the potential of C. difficile as a zoonotic agent should be monitored (78).…”
Section: Gut Microbiome and Gi Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 In dogs, colonization by C. difficile does not always correlate with clinical signs, and C. difficileinduced diarrhea might be secondary to other underlying diseases. [58][59][60][61] However, the correlation between BA dysmetabolism and C. difficile colonization holds true, and protection from C. difficile seems to correlate with colonization by C. hiranonis, 62 another bacterium with bile acid 7-dehydroxylation ability. 63 Clostridium hiranonis is part of the DI for dogs, 36 and has been quantified in our study by qPCR.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%