2015
DOI: 10.1177/0141076815600909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of harmonising data from UK national health surveys: a case study of attempts to estimate the UK prevalence of asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operational definitions of asthma used in epidemiological studies are inconsistent, which warrants an impact on asthma prevalence . For epidemiological purposes, there should be an inclusive approach for defining asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Operational definitions of asthma used in epidemiological studies are inconsistent, which warrants an impact on asthma prevalence . For epidemiological purposes, there should be an inclusive approach for defining asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For epidemiological purposes, there should be an inclusive approach for defining asthma. This strategy has been followed by an UK group that proposed a core set of asthma questions which would allow harmonization of the definitions of asthma across UK national surveys . A set of different questions has been used in adults, but they might not apply to children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, standardising such algorithms across different populations may be impractical since databases differ in content, validity may not hold across different populations and no best practice currently exists [68]. Similar challenges arise when comparing asthma epidemiology between multiple populations [73]. These methodological issues, in addition to suboptimal reporting, should be considered when interpreting and synthesising evidence from geographically dispersed studies.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%