2014
DOI: 10.4161/21624054.2014.979658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should I stay or should I go? Identification of novel nutritionally regulated developmental checkpoints inC. elegans

Abstract: A fter embryogenesis, developing organisms typically secure their own nutrients to enable further growth. The fitness of an organism depends on developing when food is abundant and slowing or stopping development during periods of scarcity. Although several key pathways that link nutrition with development have been identified, a mechanistic understanding of how these pathways coordinate growth with nutritional conditions is lacking. We took advantage of the stereotyped development and experimental accessibili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding supports the hypothesis that there are developmental checkpoints in C. elegans in accordance with the model ‘ should I stay/should I go ’ (Murphy and Hu, 2013; Schindler and Sherwood, 2014). A hypothesis would be that the IIS pathway comprising C. elegans DAF-16 orthologues in PPNs takes part in the ‘ go/no-go checkpoints ’ model during nematode parasitism and its exophytic stage (Goverse and Smant, 2014; Schindler and Sherwood, 2014). Therefore, it would be interesting to establish comparisons between the ‘ go/no-go checkpoint ’ model from plant–nematode interactions and the ‘ should I stay or should I go ’ model derived from the IIS established in C. elegans .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding supports the hypothesis that there are developmental checkpoints in C. elegans in accordance with the model ‘ should I stay/should I go ’ (Murphy and Hu, 2013; Schindler and Sherwood, 2014). A hypothesis would be that the IIS pathway comprising C. elegans DAF-16 orthologues in PPNs takes part in the ‘ go/no-go checkpoints ’ model during nematode parasitism and its exophytic stage (Goverse and Smant, 2014; Schindler and Sherwood, 2014). Therefore, it would be interesting to establish comparisons between the ‘ go/no-go checkpoint ’ model from plant–nematode interactions and the ‘ should I stay or should I go ’ model derived from the IIS established in C. elegans .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…DAF-16 and SKN-1 share these features and can be considered as hub proteins (Schindler and Sherwood, 2014; Webb and Brunet, 2014). Such proteins are often identified as cellular targets by pathogens (Mukhtar et al , 2011; Schleker and Trilling, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using a small, experimentally mapped nervous system, they can sense, integrate and respond to a variety of environmental cues using both short-term behavior and long-term developmental trajectories 38 . For example, Jin et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%