2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0874-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline data of parasite clearance in patients with falciparum malaria treated with an artemisinin derivative: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundArtemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum manifests as slow parasite clearance but this measure is also influenced by host immunity, initial parasite biomass and partner drug efficacy. This study collated data from clinical trials of artemisinin derivatives in falciparum malaria with frequent parasite counts to provide reference parasite clearance estimates stratified by location, treatment and time, to examine host factors affecting parasite clearance, and to assess the relationships between p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study protocol was designed specifically to assess prolongation of parasite clearance half-lives, the hallmark of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum [ 29 ]. Parasite clearance half-life is less prone to confounding by baseline parasitaemia than day 3 parasite positivity [ 28 , 30 , 31 ], and remains the gold-standard for determining resistance phenotypes needed for the characterization of artemisinin resistance [ 10 , 32 34 ]. The use of clearance half-life to define artemisinin resistance was validated in western Cambodia, where a dichotomous distribution of half-lives is evident and a 5-h cut-off provides satisfactory discrimination [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study protocol was designed specifically to assess prolongation of parasite clearance half-lives, the hallmark of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum [ 29 ]. Parasite clearance half-life is less prone to confounding by baseline parasitaemia than day 3 parasite positivity [ 28 , 30 , 31 ], and remains the gold-standard for determining resistance phenotypes needed for the characterization of artemisinin resistance [ 10 , 32 34 ]. The use of clearance half-life to define artemisinin resistance was validated in western Cambodia, where a dichotomous distribution of half-lives is evident and a 5-h cut-off provides satisfactory discrimination [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships among HIV status, artemether/DHA exposure, and parasite clearance half-life was further assessed by both mediation and moderation analyses, results that supported a primary role of HIV status in modifying the delay in clearance, rather than variability in artemether/DHA exposure. Other studies have assessed the potential direct impact of artemisinin exposure on parasite clearance, although they have largely focused on artesunate [3, 12, 29–33]. Although these studies have largely found no clear associations of parasitologic responses to PK parameters, an early AL dose-finding study found that higher artemether and DHA AUCs were associated with a decrease in parasite clearance time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasite clearance estimator has been used to generate substantial baseline data that classify ART resistance as parasite clearance half-lives >5.5 hours and ART sensitivity as parasite clearance half-lives <3 hours (12,13). However, interpretation of clearance half-lives can be confounded by differences in initial parasite biomass, the efficacy of the partner drug, and the level of host immunity (12,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasite clearance estimator has been used to generate substantial baseline data that classify ART resistance as parasite clearance half-lives >5.5 hours and ART sensitivity as parasite clearance half-lives <3 hours (12,13). However, interpretation of clearance half-lives can be confounded by differences in initial parasite biomass, the efficacy of the partner drug, and the level of host immunity (12,14). Moreover, this in vivo phenotype does not correlate with decreased susceptibility to dihydroartemisinin (DHA) in standard growth inhibition assays where PF parasites (which have an ~48 hour intra-erythrocytic developmental cycle) are exposed to the drug for a total of 72 hours (5,15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%