2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Necessary for Theory of Mind?

Abstract: BackgroundSuccessful social interaction relies on the ability to attribute mental states to other people. Previous functional neuroimaging studies have shown that this process, described as Theory of Mind (ToM) or mentalization, is reliably associated with activation of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, this study presents a novel and surprising finding that provides new insight into the role of the mPFC in mentalization tasks.Methodology/Principal FindingsTwenty healthy individuals were recruited … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we used a task-based measure of theory of mind performance (i.e., deliberate engagement) to relate to intrinsic connectivity, a more specific interpretation of our findings may thus be that age differences in the intrinsic connectivity between mPFC-rSFG are unrelated to deliberate theory of mind, but that mPFC-rSFG connectivity may have a relationship with spontaneous theory of mind -consistent with the subsystems interpretation above (Andrews-Hanna et al, 2014). Because mPFC supports, but is not be essential to, theory of mind (Otti et al, 2015), these possibilities may provide important nuances for understanding age differences in theory of mind and related social cognitive behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Because we used a task-based measure of theory of mind performance (i.e., deliberate engagement) to relate to intrinsic connectivity, a more specific interpretation of our findings may thus be that age differences in the intrinsic connectivity between mPFC-rSFG are unrelated to deliberate theory of mind, but that mPFC-rSFG connectivity may have a relationship with spontaneous theory of mind -consistent with the subsystems interpretation above (Andrews-Hanna et al, 2014). Because mPFC supports, but is not be essential to, theory of mind (Otti et al, 2015), these possibilities may provide important nuances for understanding age differences in theory of mind and related social cognitive behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Diametrically different changes in subjects with schizophrenia and ASD were found in the pericentral somatosensory and motor cortex (areas 2, 3, 4, 5), anterior cingulate (areas 32, 33), frontal area 9, and hypothalamus. Although still debated (Otti, Wohlschlaeger and Noll-Hussong 2015), motivational mechanisms and reward anticipation in the anterior cingulate and mirroring functions (empathy) of the motor and somatosensory cortices are often deemed relevant to social cognition and thus considered a part of the social brain (Frith 2007; Apps, Rushworth and Chang 2016). Medial portion of Brodmann area 9 may be relevant to reasoning, including social reasoning and mentalizing (Overwalle 2011; Hartwright, Apperly and Hansen 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This region is frequently reported to be selectively activated in imaging studies during tasks that require attribution of mental states, beliefs and intentions to others. The activation is often reported to be predominantly in the right hemisphere (rTPJ) (Kubit & Jack, 2013; Otti, Wohlschlaeger, & Noll‐Hussong, 2015; Perner, Aichhorn, Kronbichler, Staffen, & Ladurner, 2006; Saxe, 2010; Saxe & Kanwisher, 2003; Scholz, Triantafyllou, Whitfield‐Gabrieli, Brown, & Saxe, 2009), although some studies report activation in the left TPJ (lTPJ) as well (Perner et al, 2006; Young, Dodell‐Feder, & Saxe, 2010). Moreover, one study used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to show that ToM performance decreased after inhibitory cathodal stimulation to the rTPJ (Mai et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%