2015
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body composition in young female eating-disorder patients with severe weight loss and controls: evidence from the four-component model and evaluation of DXA

Abstract: Background/Objectives:Whether fat-free mass (FFM) and its components are depleted in eating-disorder (ED) patients is uncertain. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used to assess body composition in pediatric ED patients; however, its accuracy in underweight populations remains unknown. We aimed (1) to assess body composition of young females with ED involving substantial weight loss, relative to healthy controls using the four-component (4C) model, and (2) to explore the validity of DXA body com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fat mass (FM) was derived using the 4-component model of body composition assessment, as described previously 21. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar Prodigy, GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA) was used to quantify SMM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat mass (FM) was derived using the 4-component model of body composition assessment, as described previously 21. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar Prodigy, GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA) was used to quantify SMM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, 3-compartment model evaluation of athlete %BF with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) has its limitations. Of particular relevance is the significant degree of error in %BF estimation of leaner individuals [24][25][26]. The radiation dose administered with DXA is comparatively low to other imaging modalities.…”
Section: Introduction ▼mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that most biological anthropologists interested in health conduct fieldwork in low‐ and middle‐income countries, however, and that mental disorders are the first or second ranked cause of disability burden in most of these countries (see Figure ), only a handful of biological anthropological studies have focused on mental health. These include Hadley and colleagues' work on depression and anxiety (Hadley & Patil, , ; Patil & Hadley, ); Sullivan's biocultural research on schizophrenia in Palau (Sullivan et al, ; Sullivan, Allen, Otto, Tiobech, & Nero, ; Sullivan, Andres, Otto, Miles, & Kydd, ); McDade's investigation on social status, psychosocial stress, and culture change in Samoa (McDade, ); Flinn et al's work on the stress response (Flinn, Nepomnaschy, Muehlenbein, & Ponzi, ; Flinn, Quinlan, Decker, Turner, & England, ); Stieglitz et al's research on depression and immune function (Stieglitz et al, ); Wells et al's research on eating disorders (Wells et al, ), and several others (Adair et al, ; Fuller, Mccarty, Gravlee, & Mulligan, ; Mulligan, ; Patil, Maripuu, Hadley, & Sellen, ; Reyes‐Garcı'a et al, ). In addition, many biological anthropologists and behavioral scientists have investigated how humans cognitively and behaviorally respond to environments of varying risk using a life history theory (LHT) framework (Belsky & Pluess, ; Ellis & Bjorklund, ; Nettle, ; Pepper & Nettle, ; Quinlan, Dira, Caudell, & Quinlan, ), which has implications for many symptoms of mental disorders.…”
Section: Biological Anthropology: a World Of Untapped Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%