2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives on Missed and Delayed Outpatient Diagnosis: The Focus on System-Related Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 In a separate study of outpatient providers using focus groups, concerns about health system structure and providers’ interactions with one another and with patients far exceeded any discussion of cognitive factors that might affect the diagnostic process. 19 Though neither study was specific to stroke misdiagnosis, these results suggest that improving outpatient diagnostic processes will require focusing attention on the organization of the health care system as well as on providers’ clinical knowledge. Among ischemic stroke patients, a study of malpractice claims found that the most frequent process breakdown was in the initial patient–provider encounter.…”
Section: Diagnostic Errormentioning
confidence: 90%
“… 18 In a separate study of outpatient providers using focus groups, concerns about health system structure and providers’ interactions with one another and with patients far exceeded any discussion of cognitive factors that might affect the diagnostic process. 19 Though neither study was specific to stroke misdiagnosis, these results suggest that improving outpatient diagnostic processes will require focusing attention on the organization of the health care system as well as on providers’ clinical knowledge. Among ischemic stroke patients, a study of malpractice claims found that the most frequent process breakdown was in the initial patient–provider encounter.…”
Section: Diagnostic Errormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Journey maps allow for identification of steps in the monitoring process that are particularly vulnerable to gaps in patient safety. From the journey map, we identified vulnerabilities in patient safety domains including tasks, technology, organization, people, and environment [21, 22]. Vulnerabilities included patient challenges (homelessness, substance abuse, and mental illness), the cognitive load of tracking patients, time-limiting factors such as the rotating schedules of residents, and overall task burden on providers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Other quality improvement activities might focus on one or more specific conditions for which diagnostic error is a significant problem, such as diagnosing acute stroke in the emergency department, improving the recognition of sepsis and other infections, improving telephone triage for conditions that can be misdiagnosed in care that is not face-to-face, and improving follow-up for findings suspicious for cancer. 45,46 We would expect that through an accumulation of local quality improvement projects, useful indicators of diagnostic performance would likely develop and inform the creation of more rigorous measure sets related to diagnosis that could be used for future safety improvement. For instance, while researchers (including Singh) have developed electronic triggers to help measure diagnostic errors based on certain visit patterns, 47 wider application and implementation beyond the health systems where they were piloted could be facilitated by these quality improvement activities.…”
Section: Alternative Payment Models Designed To Improve Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%