Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study

Abstract

The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-house protocols. Test #1 examined urine samples from adult volunteers either spiked or not spiked with 32 metabolite standards. Test #2 involved a low biological contrast situation comparing the plasma of rats fed a diet either supplemented or not with vitamin D. The spectral information from each instrument was assembled into separate statistical blocks. Correlations between blocks (e.g., instruments) were examined (RV coefficients) along with the structure of the common spectral information (common components and specific weights analysis). In addition, in Test #1, an outlier individual was blindly introduced, and its identification by the various platforms was evaluated. Despite large differences in the number of spectral features produced after post-processing and the heterogeneity of the analytical conditions and the data treatment, the spectral information both within (NMR and LCMS) and across methods (NMR vs. LCMS) was highly convergent (from 64 to 91 % on average). No effect of the LCMS instrumentation (TOF, QTOF, LTQ-Orbitrap) was noted. The outlier individual was best detected and characterised by LCMS instruments. In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics analyses report consistent information within and across instruments of various technologies, even without prior standardisation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11306-014-0740-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nutrimetabolomics: An Integrative Action for Metabolomic Analyses in Human Nutritional Studies

“…Advances in the “omics” fields have already led to the publication of validated, highly standardized datasets suitable for data mining/sharing and for inclusion in informative systems complying with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re‐usable) protocol . In that context, the international metabolomics community has made efforts to determine standard procedures, to evaluate the analytical performance of untargeted metabolomics, and to identify the needs for infrastructure, including data sharing . The Food Biomarker Alliance (FoodBAll), which includes the authors of this article, participates in this effort by fostering the application of novel metabolomic techniques for human nutrition studies as complement to traditional dietary assessment methods such as food frequency questionnaire and 24‐h recall …”

Mass spectrometry in untargeted liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry metabolomics: Electrospray ionisation parameters and global coverage of the metabolome

“…Thus, the results from this study evidence that in an untargeted LC/ESI‐MS metabolomics ' what you see is what you ionise '. Such a postulation is certainly supported by previous studies in which different ESI conditions have been used for different purposes, and by theoretically sound assumptions based on our current understanding (empirically evidenced) of the complexity of the metabolome and the functionality of ESI sources . The logic may then raise questions about the degree of accuracy and precision in the formulation of a hypothesis based on this data‐driven approach, or if untargeted metabolomics can be trusted in this regard.…”

UPLC–MS for metabolomics: a giant step forward in support of pharmaceutical research

“…Hundreds of metabolites can be separated and measured in samples of interest such as plasma, CSF, urine or cell extracts using a diversity of commonly used metabolomics tools such as NMR, GC–MS and LC–MS detection. Each of these analytical tools carries its own advantages, disadvantages and applications as shown in Table 1 [22]. Table 1 shows the most common analytical tools for analysis of the various classes of compounds, such as lipids, carbohydrates, amino acids, organic acids, sugars, sugar phosphates, biogenic amines, nucleotides, vitamins, purines, fatty acids and steroids.…”