2014
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu276.260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

260 * Current Evidence of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Off-Pump Versus on-Pump: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of More Than 16,500 Patients Investigated in 66 Randomised Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, some previous meta-analyses also found the off-pump CABG could significantly increase the revascularization rate compared with on-pump CAGB. 34,35 Hence, off-pump CABG must be guardedly applied in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, some previous meta-analyses also found the off-pump CABG could significantly increase the revascularization rate compared with on-pump CAGB. 34,35 Hence, off-pump CABG must be guardedly applied in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%