2015
DOI: 10.3791/52871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-immunoprecipitation of the Mouse Mx1 Protein with the Influenza A Virus Nucleoprotein

Abstract: Citation: Verhelst, J., De Vlieger, D., Saelens, X. Co-immunoprecipitation of the Mouse Mx1 Protein with the Influenza A Virus Nucleoprotein. J. Vis. Exp. (98), e52871, doi:10.3791/52871 (2015). AbstractStudying the interaction between proteins is key in understanding their function(s). A very powerful method that is frequently used to study interactions of proteins with other macromolecules in a complex sample is called co-immunoprecipitation. The described co-immunoprecipitation protocol allows to demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously showed that A2G Mx1 inhibits the interaction between NP and PB2 and that this inhibition correlates with the antiviral activity (18,35). Therefore, we investigated the ability of both Mx1 proteins to suppress the interaction between PB2 and NP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We previously showed that A2G Mx1 inhibits the interaction between NP and PB2 and that this inhibition correlates with the antiviral activity (18,35). Therefore, we investigated the ability of both Mx1 proteins to suppress the interaction between PB2 and NP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The HEK293T cell line was selected as the first choice for the transfection of plasmids throughout the study except for virus infection experiments because the HEK293T cells are well used in previous studies [6,38,49,50]. Since influenza viruses are the pathogens that cause major respiratory tract infections, the lung epithelial cells might be used for in vitro analysis of host-virus interaction at the cellular level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HEK293T cells were then co-transfected with p3XFLAG-tagged eqMx1 (4 µg) together with PB1, PB2 (2 µg each), PA, FF-Luc (1 µg each), and NP expression plasmids either from (1) H7N9, and its mutants H7N9-S34G and N52H; or (2) H3N8 JL89 and its mutants JL89-G34S and H52N; or (3) an empty control vector (4 µg each) by using PolyJet™ In Vitro DNA transfection reagent (SignaGen, Rockville, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. At24 hr post-transfection, co-immunoprecipitation was performed as previously described [38]. Briefly, transfected cells were lysed using an ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM of Tris-HCL [pH 8], 150 mM of NaCl, 5 Mm of EDTA, and 1% NP-40), protease inhibitors (1:100), and freshly prepared 2 M N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) at 1:80 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and centrifuged at 4 • C for 10 min at 13,000× g. Post centrifugation, using Anti-FLAG M2 magnetic beads (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, M8823) or Anti-NP magnetic beads (made by incubation of MCE protein A/G magnetic beads along with the NP antibody from our lab) the lysates were co-incubated for 2 hr at 4 • C. Using a magnetic separator, the resins were harvested and washed thrice with cold PBS.…”
Section: Co-immunoprecipitation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soluble fraction (the cell lysate) was transferred to a fresh 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and kept on ice. Co‐IP was performed immediately according to the protocol by Judith Verhelst 40 . Anti‐MFAP5, anti‐DLL3, and anti‐NOTCH2 antibody was used for Co‐IP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%