Abstract:BackgroundLocal control is always considered in metastatic neuroblastoma (NBL). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of radical surgery on survival in children over 1 year of age.MethodsFifty-eight patients older than 1 year of age with metastatic NBL were treated with conventional plus high-dose chemotherapy with or without addition of local radiotherapy (RT, 21Gy). Surgery was classified as radical surgery (complete resection and gross total resection) or non-radical surgery. The Kaplan-Meier meth… Show more
“…34,35 In fact, omission of radiation in patients with HR-NB who have undergone GTR has resulted in favorable local control rates in some studies 27,36 but not all. 3,37 Although there has been a decrease in life-threatening late effects with reduction in treatment exposure seen with childhood cancers such as Wilms and leukemia, there has been an increase in late mortality in neuroblastoma, attributed to the increase in therapeutic exposure. 38 With the primary goal of balancing outcomes with toxicity, and with the favorable rates of local control observed in our large cohort, we recommend dose reduction on protocol in patients with favorable prognostic factors, such as those who achieve GTR and do not have adverse biologic factors like MYCN amplification or LDH ≥1500 U/L.…”
Purpose
The optimal dose of radiation in high-risk neuroblastoma is unknown. We sought to evaluate local control following 21-Gy radiotherapy (RT) to the primary site in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Patients and Methods
After receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy and gross total resection (GTR), 246 patients (ages 1.2–17.9, median 4.0 years) with high-risk neuroblastoma underwent RT to the primary site at xxx from 2000–2014. RT consisted of 21 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 1.5 Gy each. Local failure (LF) was correlated with biologic prognostic factors and clinical findings at the time of diagnosis and start of RT.
Results
Median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.4 years. Cumulative incidence of LF was 7.1% at 2 years post-RT and 9.8% at 5 years post-RT. The isolated LF rate was 3.0%. Eighty-six percent of all local failures were within the RT field. Local control was worse in patients who required more than one surgical resection to achieve GTR (22.4% vs 8.3%, p=0.01). There was also a trend towards inferior local control with MYCN-amplified tumors or serum LDH ≥1500 U/L (p=0.09 and p=0.06 respectively).
Conclusion
After intensive chemotherapy and maximal surgical debulking, hyperfractionated RT with 21 Gy in high-risk neuroblastoma results in excellent local control. Given the young patient age, concern for late effects, and local control >90%, dose-reduction may be appropriate for patients without MYCN amplification who achieve GTR.
“…34,35 In fact, omission of radiation in patients with HR-NB who have undergone GTR has resulted in favorable local control rates in some studies 27,36 but not all. 3,37 Although there has been a decrease in life-threatening late effects with reduction in treatment exposure seen with childhood cancers such as Wilms and leukemia, there has been an increase in late mortality in neuroblastoma, attributed to the increase in therapeutic exposure. 38 With the primary goal of balancing outcomes with toxicity, and with the favorable rates of local control observed in our large cohort, we recommend dose reduction on protocol in patients with favorable prognostic factors, such as those who achieve GTR and do not have adverse biologic factors like MYCN amplification or LDH ≥1500 U/L.…”
Purpose
The optimal dose of radiation in high-risk neuroblastoma is unknown. We sought to evaluate local control following 21-Gy radiotherapy (RT) to the primary site in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Patients and Methods
After receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy and gross total resection (GTR), 246 patients (ages 1.2–17.9, median 4.0 years) with high-risk neuroblastoma underwent RT to the primary site at xxx from 2000–2014. RT consisted of 21 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 1.5 Gy each. Local failure (LF) was correlated with biologic prognostic factors and clinical findings at the time of diagnosis and start of RT.
Results
Median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.4 years. Cumulative incidence of LF was 7.1% at 2 years post-RT and 9.8% at 5 years post-RT. The isolated LF rate was 3.0%. Eighty-six percent of all local failures were within the RT field. Local control was worse in patients who required more than one surgical resection to achieve GTR (22.4% vs 8.3%, p=0.01). There was also a trend towards inferior local control with MYCN-amplified tumors or serum LDH ≥1500 U/L (p=0.09 and p=0.06 respectively).
Conclusion
After intensive chemotherapy and maximal surgical debulking, hyperfractionated RT with 21 Gy in high-risk neuroblastoma results in excellent local control. Given the young patient age, concern for late effects, and local control >90%, dose-reduction may be appropriate for patients without MYCN amplification who achieve GTR.
“…This is in agreement with Tajiri et al ., who reported that extirpation of the primary tumor without extensive surgery, similar to GTR/STR, might prevent local recurrence when combined radiation therapy is used for INSS 4 NB patients who have undergone radical operation after induction chemotherapy. Moreover, radical surgery did not contribute to improve OS in patients with metastatic NB, despite the fact that the patients underwent surgery immediately after conventional chemotherapy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, radical surgery did not contribute to improve OS in patients with metastatic NB, despite the fact that the patients underwent surgery immediately after conventional chemotherapy. 13 In the 1980s, the conventional treatment strategy (i.e. 30 Gy irradiation without HDC), was shown to improve prognosis.…”
“…Tomotherapy, Volumetric-modulated arc therapy, Neuroblastoma, Dosimetric comparison, Pediatric high-risk forms of the disease. [1][2][3] Radiotherapy constitutes a complex problem because of the shapes of the target volumes and the need to minimize the involvement of organs at risk (OARs). 4 In recent years, new radiotherapy technologies, such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (TOMO), have been widely used in the clinic.…”
Importance
Irradiation treatment for pediatric patients with neuroblastoma represents a major challenge due to the pediatric dose limits for critical structures and the necessity of sufficient dose coverage of the clinical target volume for local control.
Objective
To investigate dosimetric differences between tomotherapy (TOMO) and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as retroperitoneal radiotherapy for children with neuroblastoma.
Methods
Eight patients who received retroperitoneal radiotherapy for neuroblastoma were selected for comparison of TOMO and VMAT treatment plans. The D
min
, D
max
, D
mean
, D
95
, D
2
, and D
98
of planning target volume (PTV), conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), and organs at risk (OARs) parameters were compared. Delivery machine unit (MU) and image‐guide radiotherapy solution results were also compared.
Results
All patients received a cumulative dose of 19.5 Gy to the PTV. VMAT showed higher CI (0.93 ± 0.02), compared with TOMO (0.87 ± 0.03,
P <
0.001). Notably, the average PTV HI was significantly better using TOMO (1.05 ± 0.01) than VMAT (1.08 ± 0.02,
P =
0.003). Compared with VMAT, the D
min
, D
95
, and D
98
all exhibited increases in TOMO; D
max
variation was less than 1% in TOMO. The D
0.1cc
for the spinal cord and D
2cc
for the small intestine were better in TOMO in terms of OARs. However, TOMO had more MUs and required a longer delivery time.
Interpretation
Both planning techniques are capable of producing high‐ quality treatment plans. TOMO is superior for PTV coverage, but inferior for CI. TOMO requires extra treatment time; its cost is greater than the cost of VMAT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.